Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
The petitioner, owner of land in Gut No.68/2, challenged a mutation entry that recorded a sale of 5 R land in violation of the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. He alleged that the village Talathi and Circle Officer certified the entry without following …
The petitioners sought permission to adduce additional evidence concerning a 1997 sale deed of 10 R of land in Nanded district. The respondents argued that the sale deed was illegal under a 2023 State Government notification because the land exceeded 20 R, rendering it non‑sustainable. The court …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 31 May 2018 issued by the District Superintendent of Land Records, Beed, alleging that the Superintendent acted beyond his statutory authority under the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. The respondents raised a …
The petition challenges an order dated 12 September 2007 by the revisional authority that entertained a revision application filed on 19 October 2002, nearly eight years after a consolidation scheme was modified under the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, …
The appellant sought possession of a 3‑acre agricultural field based on a registered sale deed dated 21‑04‑1979. The defendants argued that the deed was a sham, executed as collateral for a money‑lending transaction, and that the sale violated the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and …
