Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Maharashtra Prevention of Malpractices at University, Board and Other Specified Examination Act, 1982

156 judgments · newest first · showing 1–156

WAAHID SHAH GULAB SHABversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court …

DIGVIJAY DATTATRAY INAMDARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court …

TEJASWINI NARAYAN BAHIRAM AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering, holding that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority to …

SHITAL KAILAS JADHAV AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

RULE ABSOLUTE

The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers of the Maharashtra …

ARCHANA DADAJI BORSE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The High Court of Bombay upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority under the 1998 Act to …

SHAIKH AFSER YUNUSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The Bombay High Court heard a consolidated group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the State and the Maharashtra State …

ZEESHAN ZAKIR PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET‑2018 and TET‑2019 results of thousands of candidates and their permanent debarment from future TET exams. The Court found that the examination authorities, after police‑initiated …

SUDAM BAPU MUJAGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding substantial evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the State Council of Examinations and the Commissioner had statutory authority under the …

RAKESH RAMESH KOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority …

SUBITCHA PAULMANI NADARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY AND ORS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations was empowered to cancel the TET‑2018 and TET‑2019 results of about 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering, and therefore upheld the cancellation orders. However, the Court set aside the orders …

KIRAN DAGDU TADVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY AND ORS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations was empowered to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of about 7,880 candidates after finding substantial evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. The court found the Commissioner had authority under the 1998 Act and the 2010 …

NISAR AHMED SHAFIQUE AHMED (MANIYA)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

RULE ABSOLUTE

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers …

MOHAMMAD SIDDIQUE ASHRAF TADVI BHEELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

RULE ABSOLUTE

The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had the statutory authority to …

ASMA RAMZAN PATHAN AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State's and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Council had authority under …

ARCHANA VINAYAK PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's order cancelling the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the Commissioner of the Council …

DATTATRAY ANNASO LAMBEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Dattatray Annaso Lambe, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with a complaint lodged under sections of the Bombay Police Act and the Maharashtra Prevention of Malpractices at University Board and Other Specified Examination Act, 1982. After the hearing, the applicant’s …

PAWANDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

Pawandeep Singh filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (referred to as Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) seeking to quash FIR No.208 of 2023, which alleged offences under various IPC sections and the Maharashtra Prevention of …