Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioner, Ganesh Brijmohan Pokhriyal, challenged Mutation Entry No. 1180 which recorded the State Government as the occupier of his land in Mulgaon, Ambernath, on the basis of a declaration that the land was a private forest under the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975. The …
The petitioner, Ganesh Brijmohan Pokhriyal, challenged Mutation Entry No. 1180 which recorded the State Government as the occupier of his land in Mulgaon, Ambernath, on the basis of a declaration that the land was a private forest under the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975. The …
The appellants, private landowners in Maharashtra, challenged revenue annotations and mutation entries that labelled their lands as private forests and vested in the State, arguing that the statutory requirements for acquisition were not fulfilled. The State contended that notices issued under …
Godrej & Boyce acquired a 133-acre parcel in Vikhroli, which was declared waste land and cultivated before 1951. The State later issued a show‑cause notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (notice No. WT/53) in 1956‑57, but never served it or took possession, while repeatedly …
The Supreme Court examined whether a 53‑acre portion of Survey No. 345‑A in Dahisar was a "private forest" under the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 on the appointed day of 30 August 1975, and whether the State’s acquisition of that land was proportionate and lawful. The Court …
C.G. Velkar, a private forest land holder, challenged the vesting of his 20‑hectare land in Versave village in the State of Maharashtra under the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975. The dispute centered on whether the word "issue" in Section 2(f)(iii) of the Act required actual …
