Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
72 judgments · newest first · showing 1–72
The petitioners, who purchased portions of Gut No. 127 in Jalna, sought to quash a communication dated 16‑06‑2025 issued by the Deputy Superintendent of Police (Economic Wing) directing the Sub Registrar to prohibit further transfer of the land. They argued that they were not accused under the …
The applicants, Usha Ganesh More and Sushila Rajendra Maske, who are President and Vice‑President of Shri Saibaba Mahila Nagari Co‑operative Patsanstha Ltd., were charged with large‑scale deposit fraud under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Maharashtra Protection of Interest …
Akshay Meshok Ingale was arrested on 13 June 2024 in connection with Crime No. 521 of 2024 for offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 read with 34 and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. He filed a third bail application, offering to deposit Rs 5 lakhs …
Akshay Meshok Ingale was arrested on 13 June 2024 in connection with Crime No. 521 of 2024 for offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 read with 34 and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. He filed a third bail application, offering to deposit Rs 5 lakhs …
Akshay Meshok Ingale was arrested on 13 June 2024 in connection with Crime No. 521 of 2024 for offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 read with 34 and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. He filed a third bail application, offering to deposit Rs 5 lakhs …
Akshay Meshok Ingale was arrested on 13 June 2024 in connection with Crime No. 521 of 2024 for offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 read with 34 and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. He filed a third bail application, offering to deposit Rs 5 lakhs …
Suraj and Kiran Mahadik, agricultural borrowers, were arrested for alleged diversion of a Rs 50 lakh loan sanctioned under a cooperative society, facing charges under IPC sections 409, 420 and 34, and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The Special Court had denied …
The applicant, Venkatesh Bapurao Kulkarni, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with FIR No. 0451 of 2026 alleging misappropriation of funds of the Rajasthan Multi State Cooperative Society, invoking IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 120‑B, 34 and Maharashtra Protection of Interest of …
The applicant, Gajanan Prabhakarrao Udawant, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with FIR No. 0451/2026 alleging misappropriation of funds of a cooperative society, invoking IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 120‑B, 34 and Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act sections 3 and …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction for attachment of properties under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999. The Assistant Public Prosecutor placed on record a communication dated 20 August 2026 along …
The applicant, Santosh Arunrao Survase, a tax officer, sought regular bail in a case involving alleged cheating, forgery and violations of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, induced depositors to invest in a cooperative …
Ambadas, an 86‑year‑old accused, applied for regular bail in two separate FIRs (Crime No. 644/2023 and Crime No. 30/2024) involving a range of IPC offences, the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act and the Bailing of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act. He argued that the offences arose …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Rajesh Maruti Padalkar, who was arrested in connection with alleged cheating, criminal breach of trust and fraud offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Protection …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Rajesh Maruti Padalkar, who was arrested in connection with alleged cheating, criminal breach of trust and fraud offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Protection …
The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Mahesh Balwant Shevale, accused of offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 120‑B, 201 and 34 and Maharashtra MPID Act sections 3, 4 and 8. The …
The applicant, Sachin Virupakash Vibhute, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking release on bail for alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 417, 420, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, …
Manisha Anandrao Magar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged financial fraud under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999. The prosecution alleged that she was a director of Lakshmikrupa Urban Nidhi …
The petitioners, alleging victimhood in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, sought a court order for the constitution of a Special Investigation …
Shri Sahebrao Subrao Shelke, a tax consultant, was arrested in connection with a large-scale investment fraud allegedly perpetrated by A.S. Traders and its subsidiaries, and charged under IPC sections 406, 409, 420 read with 34 and MPID Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant contended he was merely an …
The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, considered the bail application of Balaso Krushnat Dhangar, who was arrested in connection with a large‑scale investment fraud involving A.S. Traders and Developers and its subsidiaries. The applicant argued that he was merely a victim who had invested Rs.63.34 …
Shri Sahebrao Subrao Shelke, a tax consultant, was arrested in connection with a large-scale investment fraud allegedly perpetrated by A.S. Traders and its subsidiaries, and charged under IPC sections 406, 409, 420 read with 34 and MPID Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant contended he was merely an …
Priti Wilson Shinde, the wife of a main accused in a financial fraud case, applied for anticipatory bail under sections 318(4), 316(5), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999. She had …
The applicant, Kunal Suresh Mestri, sought anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR alleging cheating investors in a financial scheme, under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999. The prosecution argued that Mestri was a …
The State of Maharashtra filed an application for leave to appeal the acquittal of Rajveer Navratna Sharma and Karishma Manoj Punamiya by a Special Judge, who had found them not guilty of offences under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (MPID) Act and sections 420, 406 and 109 of …
The petitioners and the State of Maharashtra sought the quashing of FIR No. 608/2024, filed under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 and the Information Technology Act, on the basis that all investors had settled and a consent affidavit was …
Ravindra Sheshrao Gawande filed Criminal Revision Application No. 22 of 2024 against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the revision and to file an appeal under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial …
M/s Kuber Planters Ltd. filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking to quash proceedings of Application No. 200 of 2024 and to declare the designated court functus officio after earlier orders releasing the properties. The petitioners alleged a misstatement of the application number and …
The applicant, Vinod Gitaram Daund, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging offences under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 and several …
Mukesh Bharat Bhoye was arrested in connection with a cheating and misappropriation scheme involving a company that promised investors a 14% monthly return, violating IPC sections 406, 409, 420 and 34 and MPID Act sections 3 and 4. The prosecution presented a prima facie case, but the trial had been …
Mukesh Bharat Bhoye was arrested in connection with a cheating and misappropriation scheme involving a company that promised investors a 14% monthly return, violating IPC sections 406, 409, 420 and 34 and MPID Act sections 3 and 4. The prosecution presented a prima facie case, but the trial had been …
Monali Harish Dixit, accused No.3, filed two bail applications under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for separate FIRs (CR No. 16 of 2011 and CR No. 100 of 2011) involving offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 34 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of …
Monali Harish Dixit, accused No.3, filed two bail applications under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for separate FIRs (CR No. 16 of 2011 and CR No. 100 of 2011) involving offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 34 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Vallabh Mansukhlal Sakhala, a director of a company, who was charged with offences under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B read with Section 34 and under Sections 3 and 4 …
The High Court considered the bail application of Ujjwala Tarachand Desarda, a director of a company charged under multiple IPC offences (sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B read with 34) and sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) …
The applicant, Kedar Prakash Vanjape, was a senior employee of D.S. Kulkarni Developers Ltd (DSKDL) who resigned in 2009. He was later implicated in a case alleging that his wife purchased land and sold it to DSKDL at a high price, and that the company accepted public deposits from investors without …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mayank Purushottam Gupta, who was charged with cheating, breach of trust, and offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Maharashtra Protection of Interest …
The Court was asked to determine the outstanding professional fees of a panel valuer engaged in 2004 to inspect and value several properties for a sale‑related exercise ordered by the Court. The valuer’s original bills of Rs.7,01,858 were later revised to Rs.6,51,062 after removal of service tax, …
The petitioner, Sukhbir Kaur, sought a direction from the Bombay High Court to prevent the State of Maharashtra from attaching properties listed in two notifications issued under Section 4(1) of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999. She …
The applicants, Rupesh Haribhau Kumbare and Kanchan Rupesh Kumbare, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with a criminal case (C.R. No.155 of 2026) alleging offences under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aniket Manish Bhagat under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with alleged violations of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 and the …
The applicants, Manoj Patel and Ashutosh Kumar, sought quashing of criminal proceedings filed under sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506 read with 34 of the IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, invoking the inherent powers of the High Court …
The applicants, Manoj Patel and Ashutosh Kumar, sought quashing of criminal proceedings filed under sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506 read with 34 of the IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, invoking the inherent powers of the High Court …
Mukund Chandram Bhambar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a 2022 FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420 and 34, and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The applicant …
Shivshankar Jagannath Mourya was charged under multiple IPC offences and the Maharashtra Depositors Protection Act for promising high Bitcoin returns. The complainant, a tax consultant, claimed to have received the full amount back via online transfer and later affirmed no further complaint. The …
The applicants, Minakshi Nilesh Singh and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust (Sections 406, 420, 34 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023) and violations …
The petitioners, who were the original accused in FIR No.165/2024 alleging offences under IPC sections 409, 420 r/w 34 and the Maharashtra Depositors Act, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash …
The applicant, Vinod Gitaram Daund, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case alleging fraud and intimidation related to a Rs.1.20 crore loan scheme. The FIR primarily implicates accused No.1 and her husband, while …
The applicant, Shashikant Balkrushna Kshirsagar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail in connection with a fraud case (CR No.153 of 2025) involving alleged cheating of 41 investors amounting to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jayesh Jagannath Sankhe, accused of fraud under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999. The prosecution …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jayesh Jagannath Sankhe, accused in a fraud case involving a bogus investment company that allegedly duped over 500 investors of more than Rs.12 crore. The prosecution alleged that Sankhe, as an additional director and agent, induced 112 …
Primezone Developers Ltd., a real‑estate company, had its two residential projects attached under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act (MPID Act) after alleged tainted funds were invested by Mr. Ranjeev Agarwal, who was later arrested in the NSEL …
Aniket Anil Mujumdar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a fraud case (Crime No.265 of 2025) involving alleged misappropriation of Rs.2.93 crore from investors. The prosecution alleged that Mujumdar, together with co‑accused Sandesh Joshi, induced investors and benefitted from the fraud, …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, a 65‑year‑old chartered accountant, was arrested in connection with a alleged ponzi scheme where his son and co‑accused solicited deposits from the public promising high returns. The prosecution alleges that the applicant encouraged investors, allowed the …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, a 65‑year‑old chartered accountant, was arrested in connection with a alleged ponzi scheme where his son and co‑accused solicited deposits from the public promising high returns. The prosecution alleges that the applicant encouraged investors, allowed the …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The Supreme Court examined the bail granted by the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court to respondent No.1, who was accused of conspiracy, cheating, forgery and criminal breach of trust in a massive financial scam involving a cooperative society. The prosecution alleged that the respondent withdrew …
The State of Maharashtra sought attachment of the properties of 63 Moons Technologies, which holds 99.99% of National Spot Exchange Ltd. (NSEL), under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999, alleging that NSEL is a financial establishment that …
The Supreme Court examined the Central Government's order under Section 396 of the Companies Act, 1956 that compulsorily amalgamated 63 Moons Technologies Ltd. (FTIL) with its wholly‑owned subsidiary National Spot Exchange Ltd. (NSEL). The Court held that the order was ultra vires because the …
The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal appeal against Avinash, who had been arrested in connection with a fraud involving Rs 2.74 crore. While on bail, Avinash’s bank accounts were attached under Section 102 of the CrPC. He first sought to quash the FIR and have his accounts de‑frozen before a …
New Horizon Sugar Mills Ltd and its directors, who had guaranteed a bank loan, defaulted and faced attachment of their properties under the Pondicherry Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004. They challenged the validity of that Act and a government order …
