Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966

16 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.versusSANT JOGINDER SINGH KISHAN SINGH AND ORS.

1995 INSC 12722 February 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra acquired land under the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966 after the Act was amended to include a three‑year limit for publishing a declaration under s.126(2). The petitioners challenged the acquisition, arguing that the amendment applied only to pending proceedings and that compens

NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST & ORS.versusM/S BOMBAYWALA & ORS.

2019 INSC 6922 January 2019Disposed off

The Nagpur Improvement Trust (NIT) had framed an improvement scheme in 1964 that provided for a 15‑metre internal road. After the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act (MRTP Act) came into force, the final Development Plans (DP) prepared under the MRTP Act in 1976, 1989 and 2001 omitted any such road. The NIT issued d

GODREJ & BOYCE MANUFACTURING.CO.LTD.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2015 INSC 5921 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. owned land in Vikhroli that was reserved in the 1991 Development Plan for acquisition by the Ministry of Railways to lay additional tracks. The reservation required acquisition within ten years or, failing that, the landowner could serve a notice and, if no acquisition commenced wi

PARAG CONSTRUCTIONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2008 INSC 132319 November 2008Dismissed

Parag Construction and other appellants bought land in Borivali (Final Plots 22A, 228 and 22C) at a court auction in 1981 and later challenged the acquisition of that land by the arbitrator under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966, arguing that they were not given notice and therefore the acquisition was

SUBHASHGIR KHUSHALGIR GOSAVI AND ORS.versusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ORS.

1996 INSC 40218 March 1996Dismissed

The petitioners challenged a notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for acquiring land in Pandharpur to extend an existing state transport bus stand and depot. They argued that the land, reserved for residential use under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966, could not be u

MAHATMA GANDHI MISSIONversusCITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.

2005 INSC 42316 September 2005Dismissed

The Mahatma Gandhi Mission, a charitable trust, sought land from CIDCO for a college, hospital, club, stadium and staff quarters. While agreements were executed for the college, hospital, club and stadium, no deed or possession was ever given for the staff quarters. CIDCO cancelled the allotment of the disputed land an

PROMOTERS & BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF PUNEversusPUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.

2007 INSC 56411 May 2007Dismissed

The Promoters & Builders Association of Pune challenged a modification to Pune's Development Control Rules (DCR) wherein the State Government, while sanctioning the Municipal Corporation's proposal under Section 37(2) of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966, inserted the words "from the very said plot" into

NASIK MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusHARBANSLAL LAIKWANT RAJPAL AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 14529 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a scheme under the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966 for reserving land for stables and a road, which was later modified to reserve the same land for informal housing and stables. The original reservation was deleted and a corrigendum restored the status quo ante with a slight modificati

CHHABILDASversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2018 INSC 1066 February 2018Disposed off

The appellant's land was reserved for a primary school under a development plan and a purchase notice was served under Section 49 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966. The State Government confirmed the notice and the appropriate authority filed an acquisition proposal within the period prescribed by Sec

JYOTI BUILDERSversusCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & ORS.

2025 INSC 13722 December 2025Disposed off

The dispute concerned a 2,005‑sq‑m parcel in Malad, Mumbai, originally declared a slum and reserved as Recreational Ground under the 1991 Development Plan. Jyoti Builders (appellant) claimed that the 2015 order of the CEO‑SRA required the State Government to acquire the land under s.14(1) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas

DR. ABRAHAM PATANI OF MUMBAI & ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2022 INSC 9042 September 2022Dismissed

The appellants, owners of land in Mumbai, challenged the municipal corporation’s acquisition of their property for a link road, arguing that the road could only be built after amending the Development Plan under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act (MRTP Act). The High Court upheld the acquisition, holding that t

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search