Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Maharashtra Rent Control Act

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SHALINI SHYAM SHETTY AND ANOTHERversusRAJENDRA SHANKAR PATIL

2010 INSC 42223 July 2010Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal filed by tenants challenging a Bombay High Court order that dismissed their writ petition under Article 226. The petition sought a writ of certiorari against the landlord’s eviction suit, a pure civil dispute between private parties. The Court held that writ jurisdiction is a remedy

KUMUD W/O MAHADEORAO SALUNKEversusSHRI PANDURANG NARAYAN GANDHEWAR THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

2019 INSC 66710 May 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord (appellant) obtained permission from the Rent Controller under the C.P. and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949 and issued a notice under Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 before filing a civil suit for eviction. The tenant (respondent) contended that the premises fell unde

KALPESH HEMANTBHAI SHAHversusMANHAR AUTO STORES THROUGH ITS PARTNER & ORS.

2014 INSC 2381 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord filed an eviction suit which was dismissed by the trial court; the appellate court reversed that decision, finding that the landlord had a bona‑fide need for the premises under Section 7(5) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act and ordered the tenants to vacate. The tenants obtained a writ of certiorari from

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search