Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The appellants, co‑owners of a plot in Bandra, sought an interim injunction to prevent demolition of a ground‑floor brick‑masonry structure they claimed was a tolerated structure existing before 1962. The municipal corporation, relying on a notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal …
The appellants, co‑owners of a plot in Bandra, occupy the ground, first and second floors and claim that a brick‑masonry structure on the ground floor is a tolerated structure existing before 1962. The municipal corporation issued a notice under Section 351 of the MMC Act demanding its demolition, …
The Supreme Court examined whether race clubs such as the Bangalore Turf Club and the Royal Western India Turf Club, as well as a chit fund, fall within the definition of "shop" under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) and the related notifications. The Court held that a race club is …
