Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The petitioner challenged a civil‑court order that had refused to reject an agreement to sell dated 01‑04‑2022 on the ground that it was executed on a Rs 100 stamp paper, was not registered under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908 and was insufficiently stamped. The trial court had admitted …
The petitioners, Kalpataru Properties Private Limited, challenged a 2016 order that demanded an additional stamp duty of Rs 41,24,000 on a 2007 conveyance deed, arguing that the demand was actually a reopening of the stamp duty assessment on a 2004 development agreement and was therefore barred by …
The Intercontinental Hotels Group (India) and its associate entered into a Hotel Management Agreement (HMA) with Waterline Hotels, which required the latter to pay incentive fees for renovations. Waterline Hotels failed to pay and later terminated the HMA, prompting the petitioners to invoke the …
