Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioners, partnership firms holding land declared a slum, entered into development‑cum‑sale agreements in 1985 (and one in 1996) and later executed conveyances in 2012 to perfect their title. The Deputy Collector of Stamps assessed stamp duty on the basis of the 2012 market value using …
The petitioners, partnership firms holding land declared a slum, entered into Development‑cum‑Sale Agreements in 1985 (and a Sale Agreement in 1996) and later executed conveyances in 2012 to perfect their title. The Deputy Collector of Stamps assessed stamp duty on the basis of the 2012 market value …
The petitioners, partnership firms holding land declared a slum, entered into Development‑cum‑Sale Agreements in 1985 (and a Sale Agreement in 1996) and later executed conveyances in 2012 to perfect their title. The Deputy Collector of Stamps assessed stamp duty on the basis of the 2012 market value …
The petitioners, partnership firms holding land declared a slum, entered into development‑cum‑sale agreements in 1985 (and one in 1996) and later executed conveyances in 2012 to perfect their title. The Deputy Collector of Stamps assessed stamp duty on the basis of the 2012 market value using …
The Official Liquidator of Sonal Garments India Pvt. Ltd. sought to register the transfer of Office Unit No. 134‑A, sold at a Company Court‑monitored auction to Rohstoffe International Pvt. Ltd. for Rs. 2.65 crore. The State of Maharashtra demanded a transfer premium calculated on the Ready Reckoner …
The petitioner, Kumar Housing Corporation Private Ltd., challenged the demand of deficient stamp duty of Rs 2,60,49,475 on a conveyance executed on 19 March 2012, arguing that the earlier agreements of 1995 and 1999, the supplementary agreements of 2003 and the conveyance were all parts of a single …
