Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
27 judgments · newest first · showing 1–27
The petitioners, five Shinde brothers, purchased 57.8 acres of land under a certificate issued pursuant to Section 32M of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Respondent Somnath Shinde sought forfeiture of the land, and the Tenancy Avval Karkun ordered forfeiture under Section …
The petitioner filed an application under Section 47A of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 seeking relief for land in Parbhani district, but the Deputy Collector dismissed it citing a prior order of this Court in Writ Petition No. 11708 of 2018. The petitioner argued that the …
The appellant, Appa Bhimrao Rakshe, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC challenging a district court judgment that had reversed a trial court decree granting an injunction in his 2015 suit. The appellate court had set aside the decree on two grounds: that the suit property was …
The petitioners challenged a common judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal that set aside earlier orders confirming Anya Govind Patil as the tenant of a parcel of agricultural land and quashed the purchase‑price determination in favour of Babu Pandu Patil. The dispute centred on whether the …
The petitioners challenged a common judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal that set aside earlier orders confirming Anya Govind Patil as the tenant of a parcel of agricultural land and quashed the purchase‑price determination in favour of Babu Pandu Patil. The dispute centred on whether the …
The petitioners filed a review petition challenging the order dated 28 August 2026 in Writ Petition No. 11027 of 2026. They argued that the observations in paragraph 12 of that order, concerning the legal effect of a person being in cultivation of agricultural land on the Tiller’s day, might affect …
The petitioner, Dattatrey Kanu Patil, challenged a Sub‑divisional Officer's order rejecting his objection to the disbursal of compensation for 15 gunthas of land slated for acquisition under the Virar‑Alibaug Multimodal Corridor project. The objection was raised under Section 19‑B(6) of the …
The petitioners, two women from Thane district, challenged a Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) order that set aside a Sub‑Divisional Officer’s (SDO) decision deleting their names as tenants of a 89.4‑acre agricultural plot. The dispute arose from a series of mutation entries showing that the …
The petitioners sought to enforce a 1976 sale deed of agricultural land that was executed without the prior permission required under Section 43 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. They argued that the later grant of permission could not validate the transaction and that the …
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Agricultural Lands Tribunal (ALT) that rejected its preliminary objection to the maintainability of an application under Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The petitioner argued …
The petitioners sought payment of compensation awarded on 27‑04‑2026 following a land acquisition, which the respondents had withheld citing a revenue record indicating non‑agricultural use of the land and a potential penalty under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The …
The petitioner, Jumma Masjid Panvel, challenged an order of the Additional Tahsildar and Agricultural Lands Tribunal (ALT) that deferred a question on the applicability of Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (MT&AL Act) to the final hearing of a tenancy case. The …
The petitioners, claiming Scheduled Tribe status, argued that they were protected tenants of a plot in Kandivali under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, and therefore could not be evicted under Sections 33 and 38 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and …
The petitioners challenged the declaration that respondents were tenants of Survey No.80, arguing that earlier mutation entries and a Section 32M certificate established their own tenancy rights. The court examined the sequence of mutation entries, the absence of a Section 32G purchase price …
The petitioners challenged a judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) that upheld a Sub‑Divisional Officer's order deleting the name of Respondent No. 4 from the record of rights of a 60‑are land in Raigad. The petitioners claimed they were the owners and argued that the …
The appellants, heirs of protected tenants, sought a temporary injunction to restrain respondents (CIDCO and others) from further development of Plot No.20D, Airoli, pending a suit challenging mutation entries and claiming ownership under a Section 32M certificate of the Maharashtra Tenancy and …
The petitioner, Ramesh Pandurang Khishmatrao Decd, challenged an order dated 17 July 2026 issued by the President of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, which remanded Appeal No. 142 of 2024 to the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) for a fresh decision. The petitioner feared that the remand would confine …
The petitioners sought fixation of the purchase price of suit lands under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, after a Tahsildar had allowed their claim and a Sub‑Divisional Officer confirmed it. The Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal set aside those orders, relying on an earlier …
The petitioner, claiming to be the daughter of the late Babu Ganpat, sought fixation of a purchase price under Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, asserting that her father was a protected tenant who became a deemed purchaser on the tiller’s day. The Agricultural …
The petitioners sought relief against the Minister’s orders cancelling mutation entries and setting aside a sale of Mahar Watan land that had been transferred without the Collector’s prior sanction. The dispute centered on whether the 2002 amendment inserting Section 5(4) into the Bombay Inferior …
The petitioners, a group of agriculturists, challenged a common order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal dated 3 September 2024 which had set aside a 5 December 2023 order that upheld the tenancy of their predecessor Anya Patil and allowed the respondents’ review applications. The dispute centered …
The petitioners, a group of agriculturists, challenged a common order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal dated 3 September 2024 which had set aside a 5 December 2023 order that upheld the tenancy of their predecessor Anya Patil and allowed the respondents’ review applications. The dispute centered …
The petitioners challenged the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal’s (MRT) order dismissing their revision application against a Sub‑Divisional Officer’s (SDO) order in Tenancy Appeal No. 13 of 2016. The original Section 32G application under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 sought …
The petitioners, claiming to be sisters of certain respondents, challenged a permission granted by the Special Divisional Officer under Section 43 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act to sell joint family land to a nephew. They filed a revision before the Maharashtra Revenue …
The case concerned agricultural Watan lands in Maharashtra held by the heirs of the original Watandar after his death in 1958. The appellants sought possession of the lands under sections 5, 11 and 11A of the Maharashtra Hereditary Offices Act, 1874, arguing that the tenancy created by the tenants …
A group of heirs filed a suit in 1987 to set aside a 1963 Agricultural Lands Tribunal order and a 1954 sale certificate concerning land that had been placed under the control of a court‑appointed receiver after the death of the original owner in 1946. The defendants moved to reject the plaint under …
The appellants, long‑time tenants of a parcel of agricultural land, sought to exercise their statutory right to purchase the land after the landlord, a widow, died and her interest passed to her heir. The lower courts held that the tenants had lost the right because they failed to give the required …
