Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The dispute involves two adjacent landowners where Respondent No.1 initiated proceedings under Section 5(3) of the Mamlatdar Courts Act, 1906 before the Tahsildar, which were rejected for delay. A revision under Section 23 of the same Act was filed before the Sub‑Divisional Officer, who allowed the …
The petitioners challenged a Mamlatdar order directing them to remove an obstruction on a road bordering agricultural lands (Gat Nos. 305 and 313) and a subsequent revision order dismissing their appeal. The respondents argued that an alternate road existed and that electric poles on the boundary …
The appellant, owner of agricultural land in Goa, sought a declaration from the Mamlatdar that certain occupants were not tenants under the Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964. The Mamlatdar granted a negative declaration, which was later set aside by the High Court on the ground that …
