Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The petitioners, adjoining agriculturists, disputed a pathway claimed by the respondents and challenged a Mamlatdar order that granted the respondents right of way. They filed a civil suit seeking a temporary injunction, but the trial court rejected the application, and the first appellate court …
The applicants filed a civil revision challenging an order dated 15 March 2012 issued under section 5 of the Mamlatdar’s Court Act, 1906, which had been allowed in favour of the respondents. The revision was previously rejected by the Sub‑Divisional Officer on 30 November 2015, confirming the …
Petitioners Motiram Raoji Marathe and others filed a writ petition challenging an order, but the Court noted that a statutory revision remedy under the Mamlatdar’s Court Act, 1906 was available. The Court expressed its disinclination to entertain the petition on its merits and allowed the …
The respondent, who owned a parcel of land, served a notice to the appellant to vacate and obtained a final order of eviction, which was confirmed by the Supreme Court. Execution proceedings were later initiated, but the appellant objected, arguing that more than twelve years had elapsed and the …
