Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
8 judgments · newest first · showing 1–8
The petitioner filed an application under Section 5(2) of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act before the Tahsildar, Newasa, which remained pending at the stage of issuing notice. He invoked a Government Resolution dated 22 May 2025, which mandates that proceedings under Section 143 of the Maharashtra Land …
The petitioner, Rukhminibai Vishwanath Dudhate, filed a regular civil suit seeking to quash an order granting a way through Gut Nos. 309 and 310 and to obtain a permanent injunction against any road from her land in Gut No. 316. The Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) later remanded the matter to the …
The petitioners challenged orders passed under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, arguing that two panchanamas showing construction rendered the orders illegal. The trial court held that the construction of trees, houses, and cattle sheds adjacent to the customary way did not obstruct it, and …
The petitioners filed a revision against an order of the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalna, which had allowed a civil suit for removal of encroachment on a road. The petitioners argued that the trial court erred by not appreciating the precedent in Fatima Joao v. Village Panchayat of …
The petitioners, adjoining landholders, were defendants in a civil suit where the plaintiff obtained a temporary injunction on 4‑Oct‑2021 to remove an obstruction on a pathway. The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the injunction, alleging abuse of revenue proceedings and the existence …
The petitioners challenged a notice issued by the Tahsildar under the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act for measuring lands, which included parcels belonging to the petitioners even though they were not parties to the proceedings. They argued that the notice adversely affected their interests and sought …
The petitioner, Nana Kama Patil, challenged the Sub‑Divisional Officer’s (SDO) order dated 04‑07‑2025 which upheld a customary right of way through his land and directed him not to obstruct it. The petitioner argued that the SDO had been inconsistent in earlier orders, that the affidavit of Manohar …
Ramchandra Popat Satav, the owner of land Gat No. 630/2 in Solapur, filed a regular civil suit seeking perpetual and temporary injunctions against Dattatray Ganpat Satav and others for alleged obstruction of his cultivation. The respondents claimed a 12‑foot customary road on the western side of the …
