Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The petitioners, owners of land Gut Nos. 88 and 89, challenged an order of the Tahsildar, Bhokardan issued under the Mamlatdar Courts Act directing the Circle Officer to remove road obstructions adjoining their land. They argued that they were not made parties to the proceedings and that the order …
The petitioner, Uday S. Jagtap, challenged an injunction granted under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act that barred him from using an approach road across his father's land (Gat No. 100/2). He argued that the application was untenable due to non‑joinder of the necessary party (his father, the …
The petitioners, a group of agriculturists, challenged the Sub‑Divisional Officer’s order dated 28‑02‑2024 that allowed a revision and set aside the Mamlatdar Court’s order of 24‑01‑2024 concerning an alleged obstruction of an approach road between village Gats 218 and 225. The petitioners claimed …
