Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Maritime Zones Act, 1976

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

REPUBLIC OF ITALY & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 28226 April 2013Disposed off

Two Italian marines were arrested by Kerala police for killing two Indian fishermen 20.5 nautical miles off the Kerala coast. The Supreme Court earlier held that the State of Kerala lacked jurisdiction and that only the Union of India could investigate and try the marines, pending a determination of the applicability o

REPUBLIC OF ITALY AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2013 INSC 4318 January 2013Disposed off

The case arose from an incident on 15 February 2012 when two Italian naval officers aboard the merchant vessel M.V. Enrica Lexie fired on an Indian fishing boat 20.5 nautical miles off the Kerala coast, killing two fishermen. The Kerala police lodged an FIR under the Indian Penal Code and arrested the officers, which t

ABAN LOYD CHILES OFFSHORE LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2008 INSC 49211 April 2008Dismissed

The appellants, offshore drilling companies, operated oil rigs in India's designated offshore areas (continental shelf and exclusive economic zone) and sought to import stores for the rigs without customs duty, relying on the exemption for foreign‑going vessels under the Customs Act. The Revenue authorities, citing not

STATE OF KERALAversusJOSEPH ANTONY

1993 INSC 3572 November 1993

The State of Kerala issued notifications under the Kerala Marine Fishing Regulation Act, 1980 prohibiting the use of mechanised fishing gears such as purse seine, ring seine, pelagic and mid‑water trawl within its territorial waters. The High Court struck down the ban beyond 10 km as an unreasonable restriction on the

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAIversusM/S ABAN LOYD CHILES OFFSHORE LTD. & ORS.

2017 INSC 12582 February 2017Dismissed

The Commissioner of Customs ordered the confiscation of a drilling rig owned by Mis Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Ltd. on the ground that the rig had been brought into Indian territorial waters for repairs without filing a bill of entry, was not declared under Section 46 and was therefore imported for home consumption. The

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search