Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
18 judgments · newest first · showing 1–18
The petitioner, Jaisri Nandan Prasad, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case involving alleged forgery, cheating, criminal conspiracy and assault under several IPC sections. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, in conspiracy with others, forged a sale deed and interfered with the complainant's …
The High Court considered a pre‑arrest bail application filed by two accused, Vivek Kumar (21, a student) and Dhanji Singh (33), in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the BNS for assaulting an informant and his family. The court found only minimal evidence …
The petitioner, Amrendra Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a criminal case alleging assault, kidnapping and related offences under the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS). The FIR alleges that he had an illicit relationship with his sister‑in‑law and participated in assaulting her. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Vijendra Kumar Singh, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 64, 308(2) and 351(2) of the BNS, alleging that he forcibly had sexual relations with the informant, photographed the act, threatened to publicise the photographs and coerced her into obtaining a …
Mithun Kumar was arrested under Section 69 of the BNS following a complaint by Pushpa Kumari, who alleged that he had caused her pregnancy after a consensual relationship and then denied responsibility. The petitioner applied for pre‑arrest bail, asserting his innocence and a clean record, and both …
The petitioner, Parmanand Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case arising from a land dispute where he was alleged to have entered an informant's house armed and assaulted family members. The petitioner claimed innocence and that the matter was purely civil, seeking an amicable settlement. The …
The petitioner, Ali Imam, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a dowry‑harassment complaint (Cr. Misc. No.6141 of 2026) alleging that the complainant was tortured and driven out of her matrimonial home. The court noted that matrimonial disputes are essentially private conflicts and not offences against …
The petitioners, Md. Reyaz Anwar and Md. Daud, were charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS) for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod in a land‑related dispute. The petitioners contended that the informant had a history of filing …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint (No. 2266 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 406, 504/34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. He is married to the complainant, Chinki Kumari, but allegedly contracted a second marriage without obtaining …
Petitioner Ranjeet Kumar applied for pre‑arrest bail in a Mahila Police Station case alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including cruelty to his wife and maintaining an open relationship with another woman, ‘X’. The FIR alleged that the petitioner subjected his …
Vibha Kumari, the wife in a matrimonial dispute, was arrested under Sections 123 and 109 of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes for allegedly attempting to murder her husband by poisoning. She contended that the case was a retaliatory "counterblast" to earlier proceedings she had initiated, including a …
The petitioner, Md. Emtiyaz, sought pre‑arrest bail in a dowry‑related case (Naugachia Mahila P.S. Case No. 28/2025) alleging offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 126(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed innocence, a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Masud Alam, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a criminal case (PS‑Case No. 414 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 64(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes. The FIR alleged that the petitioner had repeatedly pretended to marry the …
The petitioners, a slum rehabilitation cooperative, sought mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to redevelop specific lands and pay transit rent owed since 2015. The Court noted the grievance stemmed from the developer's termination and non‑payment …
The petitioners, a group of eligible slum dwellers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus to halt construction of the saleable component of a slum rehabilitation scheme and to compel the developer to pay pending transit rent. The High Court, after allowing amendment, directed …
The petitioners, eligible slum dwellers, sought writs under Article 226 to halt construction of the saleable component of a slum rehabilitation scheme and to compel payment of pending transit rent. The High Court, recalling its earlier order allowing amendment of the petition, examined the …
The petitioner, Khairunnisa Siraj Solkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to decide her application dated 28 March 2024 concerning arrears of transit rent and non‑payment of rent. The petition highlighted the inaction of the SRA's Special Cell …
The appellant filed a civil suit for specific performance which was referred to mediation under Section 89 of the CPC and settled amicably; he sought a full refund of the court fees paid, but the trial court allowed only a 50% refund. He challenged this in a writ petition, arguing that Section 16 of …
