Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Medical Council of India Act, 1956

14 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

APOLLO INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & RESEARCH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2017 INSC 83131 August 2017Case Allowed

The Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences & Research applied to the Ministry of Health for permission to start a new medical college for the 2016-17 session. The Ministry, relying on a negative recommendation of the Medical Council of India (MCI), initially denied the permission, but an Oversight Committee later granted

SARASWATI MEDICAL COLLEGEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2015 INSC 72330 September 2015Disposed off

Saraswati Medical College sought a Letter of Permission to start a new MBBS programme with 150 seats for the 2015‑16 academic year. The Medical Council of India (MCI) inspected the college, identified deficiencies, and after a second inspection raised further deficiencies, leading the Union of India to disapprove the a

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusV.N. PUBLIC HEALTH & EDUCATIONAL TRUST & ORS.

2016 INSC 32218 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The V.N. Public Health & Educational Trust applied to establish a medical college for the 2016-17 academic year, submitting an Essentiality Certificate that was later found to be conditional and not in the format prescribed by the 1999 MCI Regulations. The Medical Council of India (MCI) recommended disapproval, and the

ANNAII MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2017 INSC 90314 September 2017Disposed off

The petitioners, Annaii Medical College, sought confirmation of a conditional Letter of Permission (LOP) for the 2016‑17 MBBS session and relief from a decision that barred them from admitting students for 2017‑18 and 2018‑19 and authorised the Medical Council of India (MCI) to encash a Rs 2 crore bank guarantee. The M

PRIYA GUPTA AND ANR.versusADDL. SECY. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ORS.

2012 INSC 60113 December 2012

The Supreme Court entertained suo motu contempt petitions arising from its own directions on medical college admissions in Chhattisgarh, finding that the Director of Medical Education, Dr. S.L. Adile, and four other officials wilfully flouted the Court's schedule and admitted two candidates, including the Director's da

SUDHIR N. & ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2015 INSC 2512 January 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 5(4) of the Kerala Medical Officers' Admission to Post‑Graduate Courses under Service Quota Act, 2008, which mandated that in‑service doctors be selected for postgraduate seats solely on the basis of seniority. The Court held that Regulation 9 of the Med

DR. PURSHOTAM KUMAR KAUNDALversusSTATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 9311 February 2014Dismissed

Dr. D.D. Gupta, a lecturer with an MD in Pharmacology from Maharishi Dayanand University, was denied consideration for promotion to Assistant Professor by the Departmental Promotion Committee on the ground that his degree was not recognized by the Medical Council of India (MCI). He challenged the decision, and the High

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusJSS MEDICAL COLLEGE & ANR.

2012 INSC 1511 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The Medical Council of India (MCI) appealed against a Karnataka High Court interim order that allowed JSS Medical College to admit 200 MBBS students for 2011‑12, despite the Board of Governors of the MCI having rejected the college’s application for increase of seats. The college had originally applied for an increase

CCL. IVS GAHLOTversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2018 INSC 6766 August 2018Dismissed

Colonel Indra Veer Singh Gahlot, an officer of the Armed Forces Medical Services, was considered for promotion to Brigadier in 2011 but was not selected. He challenged the promotion decision, arguing that the 2004 promotion policy could not be amended before five years and that the 2006 amendment restricting Ph.D. mark

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusKALINGA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (KIMS) & ORS.

2016 INSC 3906 May 2016Disposed off

The Medical Council of India (MCI) inspected Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS) after it sought to admit an additional 50 MBBS students for the 2015-16 academic year. The inspection uncovered serious deficiencies, and the MCI recommended that the Central Government deny the extra seats. The Central Government

DR. KRITI LAKHINA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 3024 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, 44 doctors who cleared NEET‑PG 2018, challenged Clause 4.1 of the Karnataka Information Bulletin (PGET‑2018) which required candidates to be of Karnataka origin and to have ten years of domicile for admission to 50% government‑quota postgraduate medical and dental seats. The State argued that the domic

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search