Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Mines & Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957

3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.versusM/S JAI DURGAA FINVEST P. LTD.

2026 INSC 678Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana awarded a mining contract for Yamuna sand to M/s Jai Durgaa Finvest P. Ltd., which required the contractor to deposit a security amount. The contractor defaulted on instalments and the contract was terminated on 09.03.2000, with the security forfeited. The contractor later …

NATIONAL MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ANR.

2004 INSC 335Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, National Mineral Development Corporation (NMDC), held mining leases for iron ore in Madhya Pradesh and was levied royalty by the State on the waste material known as 'slimes' produced during ore processing. NMDC contended that slimes are a waste with no commercial value and are not …

RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ETC. ETC.versusCHOKHAMAL CONTRACTORS ETC. ETC.

1989 INSC 180Remitted to Lower Court

The Supreme Court examined whether an award under the Arbitration Act, 1940 could be remitted or set aside solely because the arbitrator or umpire did not give reasons. The Court held that unless the arbitration agreement, deed of submission, or a specific court order or statute requires reasons, an …