Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Minimum Wages Act

12 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

APANGSHU MOHAN LODH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF TRIPURA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 58730 October 2003Dismissed

The appellants, practising advocates, were appointed as part‑time lecturers in a medical college in Tripura on a fixed contractual pay. They filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking proportionate equal pay for equal work, i.e., the minimum pay scale of regular assistant professors. A single judge of the Gauhati

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD.versusDAN BAHADUR SINGH AND ORS.

2007 INSC 49227 April 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, a union of daily‑rated gardeners employed by Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd., a government company, sought regularisation, continuance of service and equal pay, alleging that they had worked more than 240 days a year for several years and that artificial breaks were created to deny them permanence. The Alla

A.K. BINDAL AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 25825 April 2003Directions issued

The petitioners, officers of the sick public sector undertakings Fertilizer Corporation of India (FCI) and Hindustan Fertilizer Corporation (HFC), challenged two Government memoranda that denied pay‑scale revision for employees of units referred to BIFR and that provided no budgetary support for such revisions. They ar

BACHPAN BACHAO ANDOLANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 74518 August 2023Directions issued

The petition arose from the hardships faced by a child victim of sexual offence who, despite the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 and its 2020 Rules, was not provided with an effective support person. The Court examined the statutory definition, duties and entitlements of

GUJARAT AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITYversusRATHOD LABHU BECHAR AND ORS.

2001 INSC 3318 January 2001Disposed off

The Gujarat Agricultural University, a state‑aided institution, employed daily‑wage workers such as plumbers, carpenters and sweepers. The workers claimed regularisation and benefits of permanent Class IV employees after completing ten years of service, invoking Section 10(1)(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Indu

BANDHUA MUKTI MORCHAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 18713 August 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court entertained a writ petition under Article 32 after a letter complained of bonded labour in stone quarries of Faridabad, Haryana. It appointed commissioners and investigators to examine the working conditions and the implementation of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and related statutes.

SHAKUNTALA CHANDRAKANT SHRESHTIversusPRABHAKAR MARUTI GARVALI AND ANR.

2006 INSC 83310 November 2006Dismissed

The deceased, a cleaner employed in a milk‑transport truck, suffered a sudden heart attack and died while alighting from the vehicle. His mother filed a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, alleging the death occurred in the course of employment. The Commissioner allowed the claim without any evidence that

KAPILA HINGORANIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2003 INSC 2939 May 2003Directions issued

The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ petition alleging that numerous Bihar‑owned public sector undertakings had failed to pay salaries for years, leading to starvation deaths and suicides of employees and their families. The petition sought directions for payment of arrears and held the State of Bihar l

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusU.P. MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA PARISHAD SHRAMIK SANGH

1995 INSC 6906 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The U.P. Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad employed daily wage workers as class‑IV staff for manual tasks during examinations, paying them a daily rate fixed by the District Magistrate under the Minimum Wages Act. The workers filed a writ petition seeking regularisation and equal pay with regular class‑IV employees. The Allah

M/S. REETU MARBLESversusPRABHAKANT SHUKLA

2009 INSC 12793 December 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, an accountant employed by M/s Reetu Marbles, was terminated on 11 June 1987. The Labour Court held the termination illegal, ordered reinstatement but denied any back wages, noting the respondent failed to prove he was unemployed during the 15‑year gap before the award. The Allahabad High Court modified

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search