Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1994

13 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusPREMA DEVI & ORS.

2008 INSC 27529 February 2008Case Allowed

The claimant, a gratuitous passenger, was injured in an accident on 1 June 1996 while traveling in a goods carriage. The owner of the vehicle had not taken an insurance policy covering such passengers, and the insurer (National Insurance Co.) argued it was not liable for compensation. The Supreme Court examined the def

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusDEVIREDDY KONDA REDDY AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2003 INSC 3324 January 2003Appeal(s) allowed

Certain goods vehicles insured by Oriental Insurance Company were involved in accidents that killed unauthorised or gratuitous passengers. Claims were filed under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held the insurer liable for compensation. The High Court upheld that decision, relying on

RESHMA KUMARI AND OTHERSversusMADAN MOHAN AND ANOTHER

2009 INSC 94223 July 2009Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court examined the method of calculating compensation under the Motor Vehicles Acts of 1939 and 1988, focusing on whether the multiplier in the Second Schedule must be applied rigidly and what criteria should guide the determination of the multiplicand (future earnings). The Court noted that earlier decisio

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusRATTANI AND OTHERS

2008 INSC 148418 December 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The accident occurred on 15 May 2002 when a Tata 407 goods vehicle, being used to transport members of a marriage party, overturned, killing Sunil Kumar and injuring several others. The claimants, heirs and legal representatives of the deceased and injured, filed claim petitions before the Motor Vehicles Claims Tribuna

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusCHOLLETI BHARATAMMA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 108612 October 2007Disposed off

The case concerned several accidents in which passengers, often paying a nominal fare, were travelling in lorries classified as goods carriages. Claimants sought compensation from the insurers of the vehicle owners under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, arguing that the insurers were liable for death or inj

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusC. PADMA AND ANR.

2003 INSC 47512 September 2003Dismissed

The respondents were injured in a motor accident on 18 February 1989 and filed a claim petition for compensation on 2 November 1995. The appellant, New India Assurance Co., argued that the claim was barred by the six‑month limitation prescribed in Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (as read with the repeale

MUKUND DEWANGANversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ETC.

2017 INSC 57611 February 2016Matter referred to larger bench

The appeal concerned whether a holder of a licence to drive a light motor vehicle (LMV) must obtain a separate endorsement to drive a transport vehicle that falls within the LMV weight class. The Court examined the definitions of "light motor vehicle" and "transport vehicle" under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the effe

DHANNALALversusD.P. VIJAYVARGIYA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 6347 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was injured in a road accident on 4 December 1990 and filed a claim petition for compensation before the Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal on 7 December 1991, seeking condonation of a four‑day delay. The Tribunal condoned the delay, but the High Court set aside that order, relying on Section 166(3

M/S. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusBALJIT KAUR AND ORS.

2004 INSC 196 January 2004Case Partly allowed

The case concerned a claim for compensation by the family of a 16‑year‑old who died as a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle insured by National Insurance Co. Ltd. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the Punjab & Haryana High Court had held the insurer liable, relying on the earlier Satpal Singh decision. On app

THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESHversusRAMCHANDRA RABIDAS @ RATAN RABIDAS & ANR.

2019 INSC 11264 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Arunachal Pradesh appealed against a Gauhati High Court order that road‑traffic offences must be dealt with solely under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and that prosecution under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was without legal sanction. The Supreme Court examined whether the special Motor Vehicles Act override

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusASHA RANI AND ORS.

2002 INSC 5133 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned whether an insurer is liable to pay compensation to the dependents of a passenger who died while travelling in a goods carriage that met with an accident. The Motor Accident Tribunal had held the insurer liable, relying on the earlier decision in New India Assurance Co. v. Satpal Singh. The Supreme C

MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSAJU P. PAUL AND ANOTHER

2013 INSC 33 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The claimant, Saju P. Paul, a heavy‑vehicle driver employed by another company, was travelling as a "spare driver" in the cabin of a goods vehicle that met with an accident in 1993. The vehicle owner had taken a motor‑vehicle insurance policy covering only the driver and cleaner, not a spare driver. The Motor Accident

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusAJIT KUMAR AND ORS.

2003 INSC 4462 September 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The insurer, National Insurance Co., appealed against a tribunal and High Court order that held it liable to pay compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the death of a person travelling as a passenger in a goods carriage. The Supreme Court examined whether the Act imposes a statutory duty on vehicle owners

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search