National Capital Region Planning Board Act, 1985

The Uttar Pradesh master plan of 1986 earmarked certain lands of private colonisers Delhi Auto and Maha Maya for recreational use. Both applied to the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) for permission to develop their lands under Section 15 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act. After a conditional…

The appellants' land in Haryana was notified for acquisition in 2002 and an award was passed in 2004 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They filed writ petitions alleging that the land fell within a green belt under the Regional Plan 2001, that the acquisition violated the National Capital Region Planning Board Act,…

The petitioners challenged two notifications issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh for acquiring land to develop a Leather City Project aimed at relocating polluting bone mills. The Court examined whether the declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, dated 18 December 2007, was made within the one‑year li…

The case concerned several civil appeals and writ petitions challenging National Green Tribunal orders that restrained non‑forest activities on lands in three villages of Faridabad district, Haryana, on the ground that these lands were covered by special orders issued under Section 4 of the Punjab Land Preservation Act…

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL) issued a tender for transporting LPG cylinders within the National Capital Region (NCR) and stipulated that trucks must comply with Bharat Stage‑III (BS‑III) emission norms if manufactured on or after 1 April 2005 and not be older than 12 years. Sunil Bansal (Respondent No.1) ch…

The Uttar Pradesh government acquired land for a "Transport Nagar" project to alleviate traffic congestion in the National Capital Region. Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, it invoked Section 17(4) read with Section 5-A, dispensing with the requirement that affected persons file objections under Section 5-A. M/s Sh…

The Supreme Court examined the Delhi Master Plan (2001) under the Delhi Development Act, 1957, which categorises hazardous, noxious, heavy and large industries (H‑a and H‑b) as prohibited in Delhi and mandates their relocation within three years. The Court found that 168 such industries continued to operate illegally, …

The Supreme Court examined the illegal presence of hazardous and non‑conforming industrial units in residential zones of Delhi, which violated the Delhi Master Plan, the Delhi Development Act, 1957 and the National Capital Region Planning Board Act. The State Government had sought extensions and in‑situ regularisation …