Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

ASHOKA KUMAR THAKURversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

2007 INSC 34629 March 2007Case Allowed

The petitioners challenged the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006, specifically the 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) under Section 6, arguing that the Act was based on unreliable data, ignored the creamy‑layer principle, and violated Articles 14, 15(4), 15(5) and 16(4

RAM SINGH & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA

2015 INSC 23117 March 2015Case Allowed

The Union Government issued a Gazette Notification on 4 March 2014 including the Jat community in the Central List of Other Backward Classes (OBC) for nine states, despite the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) advising against such inclusion. The petitioners challenged the notification, arguing that the N

T. FENN WALTER AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 29912 July 2002Disposed off

The case examined whether a sitting High Court judge appointed as President of a State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission could continue to function as a judge. A group of advocates challenged the appointment, arguing it created a master‑servant relationship and threatened judicial independence, while the governmen

ASHOKA KUMAR THAKURversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2008 INSC 47310 April 2008Disposed off

The case challenged the constitutional validity of the Constitution (Ninety-Third Amendment) Act, 2005, which inserted Article 15(5) into the Constitution, and the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2005 (Act 5 of 2007), which provided 15% reservation for Scheduled Castes, 7.5% for Schedul

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search