Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased landowner, sought to enforce a compensation award for land acquired for the expansion of National Highway 361. Respondent No.2 claimed that a consolidation scheme under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, …
The land of the late Vasant Ghanshyamdas Haujawala was acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956 and a compensation award was issued. NHAI challenged the award via a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but the petition and the subsequent arbitration appeal …
The land of the late Vasant Ghanshyamdas Haujawala was acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956 and a compensation award was issued. NHAI challenged the award via a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but the petition and the subsequent arbitration appeal …
The petitioners challenged the non-payment of solatium and interest on compensation already received for land acquired under the National Highways Act. Their properties had been acquired, compensation paid, but the additional components were denied. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged arbitral awards that enhanced compensation for land acquired under the National Highways Act, arguing that the arbitrator improperly relied on post‑acquisition guideline values and failed to give sufficient reasons, violating Sections 28(2) …
The petitioners, holders of All India Tourist Permits under the Motor Vehicles Acts, challenged the constitutional validity of additional taxes levied by several states on tourist vehicles, arguing that the taxes were neither compensatory nor regulatory and thus violated Articles 19(1)(g) and 301 of …
