Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

T.S. DAS AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2016 INSC 99427 October 2016Disposed off

The petitioners, former Sailors appointed before 1973, claimed that after completing ten years of active service they were entitled to either a Reservist Pension under Regulation 92 or a Special Pension under Regulation 95 of the Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964. They argued that the Government's 3 July 1976 policy dis

UNION OF INDIA & ANRversusSURENDER SINGH PARMAR

2015 INSC 5620 January 2015Disposed off

Surender Singh Parmar retired from the Indian Navy after 13 years, 10 months and 13 days of service, short of the 15‑year qualifying period for pension. He claimed that, under the Ministry of Defence instructions of 30 Oct 1987, a fraction of service of three to six months should be rounded up to a half‑year, allowing

EX NAVY DIRECT ENTRY ARTIFICERS ASSOCIATION & ORS.versusTHE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 4618 May 2018Dismissed

The appellants, former Direct Entry Artificers of the Indian Navy, served ten years of active duty and claimed that they were automatically placed in the Fleet Reserve for another ten years, with fifty percent of that period counting toward the fifteen years of service required for a pension. The respondents contended

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search