Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
460 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The appellants, led by Anil B. Katariya, filed multiple criminal appeals (Nos. 464‑467 of 2009 and others) against the acquittal of Vijay Kale and other respondents under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellants sought transfer of these appeals from the High Court to the …
The appellants, Anil B. Katariya, filed multiple criminal appeals (Nos. 464, 465, 466, 467 of 2009 and others) against the trial court's acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They sought transfer of these appeals to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme …
Sustainable Agro Commercial Finance Ltd., through its representative, filed an application seeking leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant requested that the appeal be filed before the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s …
The appellants, Anil B. Katariya, appealed the acquittal of Vijay Kale in multiple criminal appeals (Nos. 464-467 of 2009) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They invoked the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that the appeals …
The appellant, a tractor dealer, claimed he gave a hand loan of Rs.45,000 to the respondent, an agriculturist, who issued a cheque to repay the loan. The cheque dated either 01.11.1999 or 01.10.1999 was dishonoured and a demand notice was sent, leading to a complaint under Section 138 of the …
The appellants, Anil Babular Katariya, filed criminal appeals against the acquittal of Vijay Balasaheb Kale under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They invoked the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to seek transfer of the appeals from the High Court …
The applicant, Digambar Yadav, sought leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that the appeal should be filed in the District and Sessions Court. The High Court, …
CLC Industries Ltd. and its directors were charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for the dishonour of three cheques. The accused filed three separate applications under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashment of the issuance of process and dismissal of the …
Virendra Pawar filed an application seeking withdrawal of Rs.5 lakh deposited by the petitioners as the 20% compensation required for suspension of his sentence. The petitioners opposed, arguing that a pending Criminal Appeal No.20 of 2024 could render the withdrawal inappropriate. The Court noted …
The applicant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque of Rs.2,50,000, which the complainant claimed was given as repayment for a hand loan. The applicant appealed the conviction, but the appellate court upheld it. In the revision, the …
The appellant, Vaishali Pradip Solanke, appealed against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), counsel sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court. The High Court …
The appellant Murlidhar alleged that the respondent Shaikh purchased bananas worth Rs.3,15,000 and issued a cheque for that amount, which was later dishonoured, leading to prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent contended that the cheque originally bore …
The petitioner, Dnyandeo Vasant Vispute, challenged a trial court order that allowed an amendment to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed by the respondents. The amendment, granted on 12 October 2023, sought to declare the complainant as the proprietor of Shraddha …
An appeal was filed by Anisa Begum against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025). The High Court considered …
The appellant, Atmaram Budhomal Talreja, appealed against an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), he sought to have the appeal transferred to the District and Sessions Court. The …
The petitioner, Isaq Mansurkhank Pathan, filed a criminal revision seeking relief from his conviction under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent (the State) indicated that the complainant had received full compensation and raised no objection to the petitioner's acquittal. …
The petitioner, Isaq Mansurkhan Pathan, filed a criminal revision seeking relief from his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent (the State) presented a compromise deed indicating that the complainant had received full compensation and raised no objection to …
The appellant, Vishwkarma Nagri Sahkari Bank Ltd., appealed against an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the District and …
The applicant, Lalasaheb Pharate, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to six months imprisonment and a fine. He filed a criminal appeal but missed the filing deadline by six days, citing that he was accompanying his daughter to an agricultural college and …
The petitioner, Isaq Mansurkhan Pathan, filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent State of Maharashtra, through its counsel, produced a compromise deed indicating that the complainant had received full compensation …
The appellant, Ashpak Shaikh, appealed against his acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025). The High Court, after …
The appellant, Narsubai Anjaya Yangal, appealed an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court. The High Court, …
The appellant, Naraubai Anjayya Yangal, appealed an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal from the High Court to the District and Sessions Court. …
The appellant Shaikh Imamoddin Nizamoddin appealed against a trial court acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran, the appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court. The …
The accused, Ramdas Hanumayya Modiraj, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to four months' rigorous imprisonment and a compensation of Rs.3,36,000. Both the accused and the complainant later agreed to compound the offence, depositing the compensation …
The petitioners sought a direction to join several criminal cases (Crimes Nos. 12/2015, 103/2016, 270/2017, 110/2015) with a private proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a joint trial. The respondents informed the Court that separate trials were already underway in …
The appellant Babulal Badgujar appealed against a trial court acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran. The High Court, after …
The appellants, Anil B. Katariya, appealed against the acquittal of Vijay B. Kale in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They sought transfer of the appeals to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran …
Anil Katariya appealed the acquittal of Vijay Kale in multiple criminal appeals under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellants, through counsel, invoked the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to seek transfer of the appeals to the District and …
The appellant, legal heir of the deceased proprietor of Kamal Distributors, alleged that the respondent purchased a television on credit and issued a cheque for Rs.13,990 dated 11‑09‑2003, which was later returned dishonoured. A legal notice demanding payment was purportedly sent on 15‑09‑2002, …
The case concerned two criminal revision applications filed against convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Both parties executed a compromise deed, wherein the complainant received Rs.1,10,000 and agreed to withdraw the remaining Rs.60,000 deposited before the trial court. …
The revision applications arose from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Both parties executed a compromise deed, wherein the complainant received Rs.1,10,000 and agreed to withdraw the remaining Rs.60,000 deposited before the trial court. The deed stipulated that the …
Satish appealed against his acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran. The High Court, after considering the precedent, ordered that …
The appellant, Laxman Murlidhar Dalvi, appealed an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), he sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court. The High Court, after …
The appellant, Baburao Hanmantrao Dabadwar, appealed an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought to have the appeal transferred to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025). The High …
The appellant, Gumanchand Kamhaiyalal Mutha, appealed against an acquittal order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal from the High Court to the District …
The applicant, Sai Equipment Pvt Ltd, filed an application seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran, the applicant requested that the appeal be transferred to the …
The appellant, Siddhi Vinayak Shetkari Shet Majur Sevabhavi Sanstha Ltd, appealed against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the …
The appellant, Kalika Nagari Sahkari Patsanstha Ltd., appealed an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal from the High Court to the District and …
Anisa Begum filed a criminal complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against Kavita Navgire. The complainant presented evidence through her son and documents, but the trial court closed the evidence on 21‑12‑2023 because the son was unavailable for cross‑examination, recording …
The appellant, Ajay Sharadchandra Pathak, appealed against a trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran …
The applicant, Ravindra Bhagwan Hiwarde, filed a leave application seeking permission to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He requested that the appeal be transferred to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium …
The applicants sought leave to appeal against orders of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran, they requested that the matters be transferred to the District and Sessions Court and treated as …
The petitioners filed applications for leave to appeal against orders of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They sought transfer of these applications to the District and Sessions Court, invoking the Supreme Court's decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran. The High …
The applicants filed applications for leave to appeal against orders of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They invoked the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that such applications should be transferred to the District and …
Ashok S/o Mulchand Agrawal filed multiple applications seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that the appeals should be heard by the District …
Ashok filed multiple applications seeking leave to appeal against his acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He relied on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that the appeals should be heard by the District and Sessions …
Ashok Agrawal filed multiple applications seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that the appeals should be heard by the District and Sessions …
The applicant, Ashok Agrawal, filed multiple applications for leave to appeal against an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought transfer of these leave applications to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium …
Ashok Agrawal filed multiple applications seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to request that the appeals be transferred to the District and Sessions …
The appellant Jalna Merchants Co‑Op Bank Ltd. appealed an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent, Rameshwar Dnyaneshwar Misal, through counsel, sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The appellant, Tulshidas Vasant Khadke, appealed an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), he sought to have the appeal transferred from the High Court to the District and Sessions Court. …
The appellant, Hedgewar Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd, appealed against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the District …
The appellant, Omprakash Ratanlal Malpani, appealed against an order of acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), he sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court. …
The appellant, Omprakash Ratanlal Malpani, appealed against an order of acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the District and …
The appellant, Omprakash Ratanlal Malpani, appealed against an order of acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the District and …
The appellant, M/s Sanjay Traders, filed a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the respondents. The matter was heard before the Hon'ble Justice Abhay S. Waghwase. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant stated that the dispute had been amicably settled …
The appellant, Shree Mahaveer Urban Credit Co‑Op Society Ltd, appealed an order of acquittal by a trial court in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium …
The applicant filed a leave application seeking permission to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and requested that the appeal be transferred to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran. The …
The appellant, Pravin Sureshrao Deshmukh, appealed an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), he sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court. The High Court, after …
The petitioner, Shobha Kale, sought relief in a criminal writ petition concerning a Summary Criminal Case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The parties mediated and reached a compromise wherein the petitioner agreed to pay Rs. 3,00,000 to the respondent, withdraw a previously …
The applicant, Vikas, was prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing dishonoured cheques related to a loan of Rs.60,000 taken from a credit society. The credit society later issued a No Dues Certificate on 19 July 2019, confirming full repayment of the loan. The …
The appellants, Anil B. Katariya, appealed against the acquittal of Vijay Kale in multiple criminal appeals concerning an alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They sought to have the appeals transferred to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme …
The appellants, M/s Ravikiran Poultry Farm and others, appealed an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They sought transfer of the appeal from the Bombay High Court to the concerned District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium …
The appellant Keshavrao Rohidasrao Telbhare appealed against an order of acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), he sought to have the appeal transferred from the High Court …
The appellants, Anil B. Katariya, filed multiple criminal appeals (Nos. 464‑467 of 2009 and others) against the acquittal of Vijay B. Kale under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They sought to have the appeals transferred from the Bombay High Court to the appropriate District and …
The applicant filed a petition seeking leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, invoking the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran. The High Court, after considering the precedent, ordered that the matter be transferred to the …
Anil Babular Katariya appealed the acquittal of a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act charge against Vijay Balasaheb Kale. The appellants, through counsel, invoked the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that the appeal should be heard by the …
The appellants, Anil Babulal Katariya, appealed against the acquittal of Vijay Balasaheb Kale in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They sought transfer of the appeals to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. …
The appellant, Shrinivas Suryanarayan Naidu, was convicted by a Judicial Magistrate First Class and that conviction was affirmed by an Additional Sessions Judge for dishonouring a cheque issued under a hand‑loan of Rs 7,00,000, invoking Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He challenged …
The appellant Aruna Yuvraj Sonwane appealed against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court. The High Court, …
Manik Vithalrao Katmande was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to 30 days imprisonment plus a compensation of Rs.4.30 lakh. He appealed, but both the Trial Court and the Appellate Court upheld the conviction. He filed a criminal revision under Section 397 of …
The applicant filed a petition seeking leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and requested that the appeal be transferred to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran. The High Court, …
The petitioner, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment, a fine of Rs.10,000 and compensation of Rs.3,50,000 with interest, filed a revision seeking condonation of a 184‑day delay, suspension of the sentence and bail. The High …
The applicant, Laxmikant Anilrao Joshi, filed a leave application seeking permission to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and requested that the appeal be transferred to the District and Sessions Court in view of the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium …
The appellant Pradip appealed against his acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, seeking to have the appeal transferred from the High Court to the District and Sessions Court. He relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that …
The appellant, Damodhar Durgaï Bhadange, sought leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant requested that the appeal be transferred to the District and Sessions …
Aruna, the appellant, filed a criminal appeal against the trial court's acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. She sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025). The High …
The Bombay High Court reviewed an application filed by Jalgaon District Central Co-operative Bank seeking to set aside an interim order that allowed the Provident Fund (PF) authorities to withdraw Rs. 6.16 crore deposited by the bank in the court. The bank argued that the deposited amount …
The petitioner, Prakash Bhalchandra Sohani, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in Summary Criminal Case No. 769/2014 and sentenced by a Judicial Magistrate First Class, a judgment later affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. He appealed the conviction (Criminal …
The applicant, Vikas Vishwanath Dolas, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to three months' simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2,45,000. He filed a criminal revision application seeking suspension of the sentence, offering to deposit an additional …
The applicant, RadhaKrushna Mahila Nagari Path Sanstha, sought leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was to be filed in the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran …
Manik Vithalrao Katmande was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to 30 days imprisonment plus a compensation of Rs.4.30 lakh to the complainant. He appealed, but the Sessions Judge and the appellate court upheld the conviction. In a criminal revision under …
The appellant, Shamdhan, alleged that he extended a hand loan of Rs.3,75,000 to the accused, Vidhya, who later issued a cheque that was dishonoured. He claimed to have served a legal notice demanding payment, leading to a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in the trial …
The applicant, Gangamai Industries and Construction Ltd., filed a leave application seeking permission to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the applicant requested that the …
The applicant, Gangamai Industries and Construction Ltd., filed a leave application seeking permission to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the applicant requested that the …
Gangamai Industries and Construction Ltd filed an application seeking leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to request that the appeal be transferred to the …
The appeal challenged a 2013 decree that dismissed the defendants' counter‑claim and ordered the plaintiff to refund excess payment of Rs 16,02,006.25 with interest. The dispute arose from a work order for a mobile ready‑mix concrete plant where the plaintiff alleged the defendants were overpaid for …
The applicant, Govind Atmaram Kubal, filed a criminal revision challenging the dismissal of his appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He claimed to have paid Rs.6 lakhs to the complainant and deposited Rs.4 lakhs before the appellate court, leaving Rs.12 lakhs outstanding. The …
The applicant, Kavita Rites Chodankar, filed a criminal revision application in the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the judgment and order dated 29.6.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ponda, in Criminal Case No.333/OA/NIA/2020/C and the judgment and order dated 23.12.2024 …
The applicant, Dilip Ganesh Naik, paid the full compensation amount to Gokul Urban Co‑operative Credit Society Ltd, which confirmed receipt. The society consented to the compounding of the applicant's alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the …
The applicant, Jitendra Ramnath Desai, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sought revision of the judgment. The revision petition was filed 591 days after the judgment, exceeding the prescribed time limit. The applicant demonstrated that the parties had reached an …
Kishori Govind Naik filed a criminal writ petition challenging the dismissal of her application for condonation of delay in payment of costs, which had been allowed by an Additional District Judge subject to a cost order dated 29‑06‑2026. The appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments …
The applicant, Gaurish Kaisare, who was in judicial custody, filed criminal miscellaneous and revision applications seeking to have the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act compounded after paying full compensation to the first respondent, Deendayal Nagari Sahakari Patha …
The applicant, Shirish Shantaram Kerkar, deposited the full compensation amount in court and sought its remittance to the Bicholim Urban Co‑op Bank Ltd (Respondent No.1) along with a request that the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act be compounded. Respondent No.1 consented …
The applicant, Pravesh Krishna Sawant, had earlier been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonour of a cheque. He subsequently paid the full compensation and the loan amount to the Keri Urban Co‑operative Credit Society, which confirmed receipt and an amicable …
The applicant, Pravesh Krishna Sawant, had earlier been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonour of a cheque. He subsequently paid the full compensation and the loan amount to the Keri Urban Co‑operative Credit Society, which confirmed receipt and an amicable …
Shanti Priolkar (Applicant) deposited the full compensation amount and sought its payment to Clima Colaco (Respondent No.1) along with the compounding of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Respondent No.1 consented to the compounding. The Court quashed the earlier …
Four labour contractors applied for anticipatory bail in a case where they were accused of cheating the sugar factory by accepting advance payments and failing to provide labour and logistics during the 2021‑2022 harvest, alleged under Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the IPC. The complainant also …
Four labour contractors applied for anticipatory bail in a case where they were accused of cheating the sugar factory by accepting advance payments and failing to provide labour and logistics during the 2021‑2022 harvest, alleged under Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the IPC. The complainant also …
Four labour contractors applied for anticipatory bail in a case where they were accused of cheating the sugar factory by accepting advance payments and failing to provide labour and logistics during the 2021‑2022 harvest, alleged under Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the IPC. The complainant also …
The High Court of Bombay, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, heard a criminal revision application filed by Mohan Anandrao Chavan seeking relief from a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Both parties presented a settlement agreement (Exh. X) which the court accepted. On the basis …
Nasir Hasan Mastan was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ratnagiri, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs.4,00,000 that was returned as 'unclaimed', and was sentenced to three months' imprisonment and a fine of Rs.6,00,000. He appealed the …
The applicant, Dhananjay Sangram Koli, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a bounced cheque in a truck purchase transaction and sentenced to six months' imprisonment and a fine of ₹21,77,000. He filed an interim application seeking suspension of the sentence …
The original complainant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act alleging a bounced cheque of Rs.12 lakh. The trial court awarded compensation of Rs.14.5 lakh and the accused deposited Rs.3 lakh with the court. The accused filed an interim application seeking permission …
The petitioner, a cancer survivor, filed a criminal writ petition seeking to expedite a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act that had been awaiting trial since 2024. The petitioner argued that her serious health condition warranted a faster disposition, while the …
The applicant, Devidas Dadaji Kuwar, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Malegaon, and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment and a compensation of Rs.30 lakh, later reduced to Rs.22.5 lakh by the Sessions Judge. While in custody, …
The applicant, Devidas Dadaji Kuwar, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Malegaon, and sentenced to two years' simple imprisonment with a compensation order of Rs.30 lakh, later reduced to Rs.22.5 lakh by the Sessions Judge. The …
The applicant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Malegaon, and sentenced to two years' simple imprisonment and a compensation of Rs.40 lakh, later reduced to Rs.30 lakh by the Sessions Judge. The applicant had deposited Rs.44.5 …
The petitioners, brothers of the complainant, challenged a Sessions Court order that set aside a Metropolitan Magistrate's dismissal of a criminal complaint alleging forgery of a power of attorney and release deed concerning ancestral property. The complainant claimed the documents were forged to …
The applicant, Ravi Kumar Giri, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 4 July 2026 and the accompanying order dated 25 August 2026 issued in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 373 of …
Arjun Yadav, the complainant in a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 2502 of 2021), filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction that the Special Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, conclude the trial within the period prescribed by …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.)/J.M. Court No. 2, Siddharth Nagar, to decide a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (Complaint No. 5666 of 2026) at an early date. The applicant argued that the accused …
Poonam Devi filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to conclude a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (Complaint No. 17710 of 2023) against Arjun Singh. The applicant argued that the accused’s non‑cooperation and a non‑bailable …
The complainant, Vaishali Anil Tikam, filed an interim application seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited by the respondent, Ashfaq H. Mansoor, who had been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and had deposited Rs.6,42,872 as surety. The respondent opposed the …
The appellant, Aneesh Ojha, was charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 506, 120‑B and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly cheating a complainant by taking possession of his vehicle, misusing cheques and threatening him with caste‑related abuse. The appellant contended that the FIR …
The accused Noor Mohammad applied for bail in a fraud case (Criminal No. 845 of 2024) alleging that he received Rs.12 lakh from the informant for a contract to erect an Airtel tower, of which part was repaid and a cheque later dishonoured. He has 14 criminal cases pending, is on bail in nine, and is …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint (Case No. 3019 of 2023) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Jalesar. The matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of …
The applicant, Nischhal Agrahari, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court to decide a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Complaint No.1368 of 2023) expeditiously. The trial court had …
The applicant, Yogesh Jugalkishore Mehta, filed an interim application seeking to withdraw a deposited amount of Rs.50,000 related to a cheque issued in 2000. Respondent No.2 had been convicted by the lower courts under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent objected, arguing …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation (the Applicant) sought condonation of a 2,958‑day delay in filing a First Appeal against an award dated 22 March 2017 in Land Reference No. 16 of 2002. The delay was attributed to administrative bottlenecks, the Covid‑19 pandemic, and the need …
Veer Singh was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, sentenced to six months' simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10 lakh, with Rs.9 lakh directed as compensation under Section 357(1) of the Cr.P.C. Both parties later entered …
The petitioner, Harsha Paresh Bhuta, filed a writ petition challenging the criminal proceedings against him. The Sessions Court, in Criminal Appeal No. 684 of 2023, allowed the appeal, quashed the judgment dated 14 September 2023, and acquitted the petitioner of offences under Section 138 read with …
M/s Rohit Enterprises, through Someshwar Mahadev Bhosale, filed a writ petition challenging a summoning order dated 23 December 2015 that sought to prosecute them under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petition was lodged in August 2024 and was listed before the Bombay High Court …
Mehadi Hassain Shamin applied under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings filed against him under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque of Rs.37,500. The cheque was given to settle a cash loan obtained from the complainant’s wife but was …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 19, Deoria, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 4252 of 2023) under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant, Ashish Agarwal, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate‑II, Jhansi to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 12883 of 2022) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …
The applicant, Nisar Ahmad, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Kanpur Dehat, to decide a complaint (Case No. 1659 of 2019) filed under Section 138 of the …
The applicant, Vijay Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Court No. 3, Kanpur Nagar to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 165517 of 2024) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …
The applicant, Smt Vinita Verma, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No. 3, Meerut, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 13526 of 2025) under Section 138 of the …
The applicant, Rahul Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 11, Azamgarh, to dispose of Complaint Case No. 2205 of 2025 filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant, Vijay Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Gorakhpur, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 118885 of 2021) filed under Section 138 of the …
The applicant, Devesh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction that the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Jaunpur decide a pending criminal case (Case No. 178 of 2022) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …
The applicants, Vipin Kumar Vishwakarma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the proceedings of a complaint case (No. 89067 of 2023) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as well as a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) and a …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No.2, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi, to dispose of Complaint Case No.2007 of 2020 filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Special Judge handling a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Complaint No. 1832 of 2020) to decide the matter within a reasonable time. The complaint had been …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking a direction to the Special Judge of the NI Act Court to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 1745 of 2020) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint had remained …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Special Judge, N.I. Act, Court No. 2, Allahabad, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 1836 of 2020) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint had remained …
The applicant Mukesh Verma filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction that the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Meerut, decide a pending complaint (Case No. 2329 of 2026) under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant, Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate-II, Jhansi to dispose of a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Complaint No. 25184 of 2023). The …
The applicant, Hasibun Nisha, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (S.D.)/F.T.C., Gorakhpur to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 21366 of 2025) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant, Hasibun Nisha, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (SD)/FTC in Gorakhpur to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 21368 of 2025) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. …
The applicant, Hasibun Nisha, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction that the Civil Judge (SD)/FTC in Gorakhpur decide a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Complaint No. 21370 of 2025) within …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.6, Varanasi, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 29 of 2026) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant, Amit Gupta, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Court‑Ist, Agra to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 3831 of 2020) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …
The applicant, Prashant Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM), Court No.6, Varanasi, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 4146 of 2025) filed under Section 138 of …
The applicant, Virendra Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Gautam Buddh Nagar, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 154 of 2025) filed under Section 138 of the …
Arun Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a complaint (Case No. 1789/2023) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for the dishonour of a cheque. He contended that the cheque was given as security for a venture capital …
Mohit Chauhan filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 10‑04‑2019 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 03‑10‑2019 issued by the Additional Court, Aligarh in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Kuldeep Singh v. Mohit …
The petitioner, Sanjay Dube, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court to dispose of suit No.207/XII/2025, which involves a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, within a stipulated period. The petitioner …
M/s V.P. Builders filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate Court No.10, Mathura to dispose of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (case No. 54778 of 2025) in a time‑bound manner. The …
The applicant, Santosh Jayram Watpade, filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Both parties submitted that the dispute had been settled out of court and presented signed consent terms. The High Court, after considering the …
The applicant filed a transfer application seeking to move a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 853 of 2023) from the Special Court in Gautambudh Nagar to another court. The applicant alleged that the trial court violated the mandatory six‑month disposal period …
The petitioner, Vivek Madanlal Jain, filed a writ petition alleging that a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (CC No. 4253/SS/2008) pending before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 47th Court, Mumbai, had been delayed for about 26 years despite a 2014 order …
The petitioner, a complainant in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (CC No. 3897/SS/2008), sought relief from the High Court after the trial remained pending for about 26 years despite an earlier order in 2014 directing a six‑month disposal. The learned Additional Chief Metropolitan …
Rohit Kumar filed an application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant’s counsel, Ankit Srivastava and Ch. Dil Nisar, failed to appear despite a revised call. Only the learned brief holder for the State, Shri Puspraj Singh, was present. …
The applicant, M/s Tyagi Enterprises, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 879 of 2022) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether it could …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite the disposal of a pending criminal case (Case No. 78342/2021) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant argued that the case, filed on …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to dispose of a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint within a fixed time. The applicant argued that the case, filed on 04‑06‑2025, remained undecided and required a …
The applicant, Dhruvchand Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a 2015 complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending before the Civil Judge, Gorakhpur. The applicant argued that the case had …
The applicant, Rajeev Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summons issued on 21‑06‑2022 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court noted that the contentions raised were essentially factual …
The appellants, T.C.I. Finance Ltd., appealed against the order of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dated 21.12.2001 which dismissed their complaint for want of prosecution and acquitted the respondents under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal, filed in 2007, …
T.C.I. Finance Ltd. appealed against the order of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate who had dismissed its complaint and acquitted M/s. Salstar Foods & Beverages Ltd. and others under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for want of prosecution. The appeal, filed in 2007, remained …
The applicant, who is the original complainant, filed an interim application seeking withdrawal of Rs.4,00,000 deposited by the respondent who was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the trial and appellate courts. The respondent opposed the withdrawal. The Court noted …
The applicant, the original complainant, filed an interim application seeking withdrawal of Rs. 3,00,000 deposited by the respondent after the latter's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a conviction affirmed by both trial and appellate courts. The respondent objected to …
The husband filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application (MCA) seeking transfer of domestic violence proceedings and, after settlement talks, the parties executed consent terms on 13 October 2025 dividing two jointly owned flats and stipulating payment of Rs.20 lakh by the husband. The consent terms …
Arvind Kumar filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to quash an order dated 29.01.2025 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge in a criminal revision, and an order dated 31.05.2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments …
The applicant, Mrityunjai Kumar Verma, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (Case No. 117674 of 2023). The applicant argued that the case had been pending since November …
Vijendra Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 24‑07‑2026 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in criminal case 873/2018 (Ganga Saran v. Vijendra Singh). The applicant …
Deepee Upasana @ Jani was arrested in connection with case crime No. 0164 of 2026, alleged to have committed offences under IPC sections 308(5), 318(4), 351(3) and 317(2) and a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the allegations …
Audyogik Vikas Nagari Sahakari Patpedhi Ltd. appealed the acquittal of Kisan Kashinath Sagar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate had acquitted the respondent. The appellant did not pursue the appeal, indicating a lack of interest in prosecution. …
The appellant, Arti Ashok Sutrale, filed Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 2009 challenging the acquittal of the respondents, Rajendra Jagannathe Bhavsar and another, by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Malegaon, in S.C.C No. 360 of 2004. The lower court had acquitted the respondents of an offence …
The applicant, Shubham Sanjay Dubey, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 31695) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the …
Shakil Ahmed Shaikh filed a criminal revision (No.512 of 2022) challenging concurrent findings against him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, along with two interim applications seeking suspension of sentence and bail. Neither the applicant nor his counsel appeared before the High …
Shakil Ahmed Shaikh filed a criminal revision (No.512 of 2022) challenging concurrent findings against him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, along with two interim applications seeking suspension of sentence and bail. Neither the applicant nor his counsel appeared before the High …
Shakil Ahmed Shaikh filed a criminal revision (No.512 of 2022) challenging concurrent findings against him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, along with two interim applications seeking suspension of sentence and bail. Neither the applicant nor his counsel appeared before the High …
The case is a criminal appeal filed by M/s. DHL Express (India) Private Limited against the acquittal of M/s. Elbee Services Ltd and others by the Special Metropolitan Magistrate in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The magistrate had held that the respondents were not …
The appellant, M/s. DHL Express (India) Private Limited, appealed against the acquittal of M/s. Elbee Services Ltd. and others by the Special Metropolitan Magistrate in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The magistrate had found the respondents not guilty of the alleged …
The appellant, Rayat Sarva Seva Sanstha, filed a criminal appeal challenging the Sessions Court's order that set aside a Metropolitan Magistrate's decision and acquitted the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Sessions Court had previously acquitted the respondent, …
The appellant, Chandrakant R. Chalke, appealed against a judgment of the Sessions Court, Mumbai, which had set aside a conviction of Prakash B. More under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Sessions Court had acquitted the respondent on the basis that the Metropolitan Magistrate's …
J.S. Building Material Suppliers Private Limited appealed against the acquittal of Balaji Enterprises and its partners for an alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Metropolitan Magistrate had earlier acquitted the respondents. The appellant failed to appear at the …
J.S. Building Material Suppliers Private Limited appealed against the acquittal of Preetam Satya Narayan Kabra by the Metropolitan Magistrate, who had found him not guilty of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant failed to appear at any of the hearings, …
Alpesh Harshadbhaai Choksi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 11210068260293 filed at Vesu Police Station, Surat, alleging offences under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The allegation stems …
M/s. Orgo Pharm Chemicals appealed the acquittal of Paramed Private Ltd. and Mr. M.R. Tiwari by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra, in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant argued that the respondents could not be traced and that a communication sent to them was …
The applicants, M/s. Atalso Grindwell (India) Ltd. and another, filed a revision application in 2020 seeking to quash orders dated 3 January 2020 and 6 May 2016 that confirmed their conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. No counsel or party appeared before the High Court …
The applicant, originally convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year imprisonment with a fine, filed a criminal revision challenging the conviction. The High Court had earlier ordered the applicant's legal heirs to deposit Rs.5,000 as cost in connection …
Mohmand Talha Susiwala, convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act, was sentenced to one year of simple imprisonment and completed the term, being released on 27 July 2024. He filed a criminal revision application challenging the conviction and, concurrently, a regular bail application. The High …
The complainant, a plastic packaging manufacturer, claimed that the respondent failed to pay a cheque of Rs.63,91,878 issued to discharge a debt of Rs.76,77,846.37, which was dishonoured and returned with a stop‑payment endorsement. A statutory demand under Section 138(b) of the Negotiable …
The appellant, Suresh M. Chhatwani, appealed against the Metropolitan Magistrate's order acquitting Umesh Dinesh Shah (Respondent No.1) of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed in the Bombay High Court. The record showed that the appellant was not …
The appellant Chunnilal Chimanaji Choudhari appealed against the acquittal of respondent Hanumant Kashiram Patil in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial magistrate had acquitted the respondent, noting that the notice issued to him was returned unserved because his …
M/s. Maxwell Industries Ltd. appealed against the acquittal of the second respondent in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Metropolitan Magistrate had acquitted the respondent, prompting the appellant to file a criminal appeal. During the proceedings, it became evident …
The High Court of Gujarat dismissed a criminal appeal because the applicant’s counsel was absent. The applicant then filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 119‑day delay in filing a restoration application, arguing that the appeal, which challenges a Judicial …
The High Court of Gujarat dismissed a criminal appeal because the applicant’s counsel was absent. The applicant then filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 119‑day delay in filing a restoration application, arguing that the appeal, which challenges a Judicial …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., through its power of attorney, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya …
Laxmi Insecticides Pvt Ltd, as the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of Saurashtra Agro Chemicals by the Metropolitan Magistrate in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and Section …
Parle Sales Services Pvt. Ltd. appealed the acquittal of Y.N. Todankar (Respondent No.1) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as ordered by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri, on 21 November 2006. The appellant indicated it was not interested in prosecuting the appeal. The High …
Fortis Financial Services Ltd. appealed the acquittal of two respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Metropolitan Magistrate had discharged the respondents, prompting the appellant to file a criminal appeal. The High Court issued a notice to the appellant, to …
The petitioner, Vaghela Parth Babulal, resigned from the partnership firm Parth Enterprise on 28 February 2019. After his resignation, the remaining partner, Mayur Dineshbhai Mistri, issued a cheque on 18 December 2021 to repay a friendly loan of Rs. 8,00,000 taken from the original complainant, …
The appellant, Rina Ghanashyam Harjani, filed an appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused in a cheque‑bounce case (Section 138 NI Act) by the 14th Additional Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara. The core issue was whether the original complainant, being the …
The applicant, Avanish Ashvinbhai Sakhareliya, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(4), 318(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay …
