Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000

7 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

FORUM, PREVENTION OF ENVN. AND SOUND POLLUTIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2005 INSC 53728 October 2005Dismissed

The Forum, an environmental NGO, challenged the constitutional validity of sub‑rule (3) of Rule 5 of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000, which permits State Governments to relax night‑time loud‑speaker restrictions for up to fifteen days a year during cultural or religious festivals. The petition

IN RE: NOISE POLLUTION - IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAWS FOR RESTRICTING USE OF LOUDSPEAKERS AND HIGH VOLUME PRODUCING SOUND SYSTEMSversus.

2005 INSC 29718 July 2005Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ filed by engineer Anil K. Mittal after a 13‑year‑old girl died because loudspeaker noise prevented her cries from being heard. The petition sought stringent enforcement of laws restricting loudspeakers, firecrackers, vehicular horns and other high‑volume sound system

SACHIN KASHYAP & ORS.versusSUSHIL CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA & ORS.

2021 INSC 33515 July 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The Allahabad High Court entertained a writ petition seeking removal of an LCD from a specific area and, in addition, issued a direction that no permission for a DJ should be granted because the noise was deemed unpleasant and beyond permissible limits under the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000. The

SHEIKH IKRAM SHEIKH ISRAIL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 41312 April 2007Disposed off

The appellants, residents of Bhandara, manufacture brass utensils in their homes. The Superintendent of Police issued notices ordering them to cease operations, alleging that the mechanical processes generated noise pollution that disturbed nearby residents, teachers, and students. The High Court dismissed the appellan

DR. BALWANT SINGHversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS.

2014 INSC 7667 November 2014Case Partly allowed

Dr. Balwant Singh, a retired Director General of Police, lived in a house opposite the Rajasthan State Assembly where frequent political rallies, loudspeakers and police‑set up barricades created constant noise and disturbance, rendering his residence uninhabitable. After his oral and written complaints to the Commissi

FARHD K. WADIAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2008 INSC 14025 December 2008Dismissed

The appellant, Farhd K. Wadia, sought a writ directing that Rang Bhavan, an open‑air theatre in Mumbai, be exempted from the "silence zone" provisions of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000, after his application to use loudspeakers was rejected following a 2003 Bombay High Court order in a earlier

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search