Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Opium Act, 1857

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF PUNJABversusNAIB DIN

2001 INSC 47028 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Punjab convicted Naib Din under Section 9 of the Opium Act for possession of opium, relying in part on affidavits of two police officers who had handled the seized sample. The High Court, on revision, quashed the conviction because the affidavits were not cross‑examined and their contents were not put to t

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusNIRMAL KAUR @ NIMMO AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 112120 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The police seized about 20 kg of poppy husk from the accused Nirmal Kaur and others, and chemical analysis showed the presence of morphine and meconic acid. The trial court convicted them under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for possessing commercial quantity of poppy straw, but

NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAUversusKASHIF

2025 INSC 104519 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) seized large quantities of Tramadol and Zolpidem tablets in multiple operations and arrested Kashif and co‑accused. Kashif applied for bail, which the Delhi High Court granted solely on the ground that the NCB had not complied with Section 52A of the NDPS Act within a reasonable time,

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search