AKMAL AHMADversusSTATE OF DELHI
1999 INSC 13124 March 1999Case Partly allowed
The appellant was intercepted at New Delhi Railway Station with a loaded revolver and two passports – one Indian and one Pakistani – and was charged under Section 12 of the Passport Act, 1967 and Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA). The Supreme Court held that Section 12(1)(a) r…
SURESH NANDAversusC.B.I
2008 INSC 9824 January 2008Disposed off
Suresh Nanda, an NRI, had his passport seized by the CBI during a search on 10 October 2006. The Special Judge ordered its release with conditions, but the High Court reversed that order, refusing release. The Supreme Court examined whether the CBI could retain or impound the passport without an order under the Passpor…
SRIversusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Q BRANCH, RAMANATHAPURAM, TAMIL NADU
2026 INSC 51620 May 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Sri Lankan national named Ranjan, was arrested in 2021 and charged under multiple statutes for allegedly being the absconding accused "Sri" (A‑5) involved in a conspiracy to revive the banned LTTE. The prosecution’s case rested solely on the belated testimonies of two witnesses who identified the appel…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusSMT. CHARANJIT KAUR
1987 INSC 1620 January 1987Appeal(s) allowed
Charanjit Kaur, the wife of Dr. Jagjit Singh Chauhan, a self‑styled president of the National Council of Khalistan, visited Punjab in 1983‑84 and met known Sikh militant leaders. The Regional Passport Officer impounded her passport on 18 August 1984 under sections 10(3)(c) and 10(5) of the Passport Act, 1967, relying o…
A.G. PERARIVALANversusSTATE, THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CBI/SIT/ MMDA, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU AND ANR.
2022 INSC 58818 May 2022Disposed off
A.G. Perarivalan, convicted for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, had his death sentence commuted to life imprisonment and spent over three decades in jail. The Tamil Nadu State Cabinet recommended remission of his sentence in September 2018, but the Governor delayed action for two and a half yea…
IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955 versus
2024 INSC 78917 October 2024Reference answered
The case concerns the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which grants citizenship to certain migrants from Bangladesh to Assam based on cut-off dates (before 1.1.1966 and between 1.1.1966 and 25.3.1971). The provision was enacted to implement the Assam Accord. Petitioners challenged it …
SARBANANDA SONOWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2005 INSC 28712 July 2005
The Supreme Court examined a public‑interest writ petition challenging the constitutionality of the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983 (IMDT Act) and its 1984 Rules, which were applicable only to Assam for detecting and deporting illegal migrants. The Court held that the Act and Rules were ultra‑vi…