Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 08.01.2026 and mandamus to restrain the respondent from interfering with his possession and demolishing his house at Village‑Admadpur Sadat. The respondent produced instructions from an oil company indicating that any …
Petitioner Pankaj Prasun challenged a notice dated 18‑01‑2024 declaring acquisition of his land for a crude‑oil pipeline under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962, alleging that the mandatory preliminary notice under Section 3(1) was never served. He …
The case concerned compensation disputes arising from the erection of transmission towers and power lines under a 400 kV project that traversed four districts in Haryana. Landowners claimed that the compensation awarded by the District Judges and upheld by the High Court was inadequate, while the …
The appellants, land owners, challenged the appointment of Shri V.I. Gohil as the Competent Authority under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962, arguing that his salary, allowances, accommodation and transport were paid by the private gas‑pipeline …
The President referred three questions to the Supreme Court under Article 143(1) concerning whether natural gas (including LNG) falls under the Union List (Entry 53, List I), whether States can legislate on it under Entry 25, List II, and whether Gujarat's Gas (Regulation of Transmission, Supply and …
The appellant, Ichchapur Industrial Co‑operative Society Ltd., owned land over which the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) had been vested with the right of user under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 for laying a gas pipeline. When water …
