Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
439 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS by Krushna alias Sonya Vishnu Jadhav, who was arrested for offences under Sections 137(2), 64(2)(i), 69 and 3(5) of the BNS read with Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashfaq @ Muse, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2), 62 of the BNS Act and Sections 5M/6, 18 of the POCSO Act for allegedly sexually harassing a seven‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed false …
Ankush Dhobi was arrested in connection with an alleged offence under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act, accused of enticing the daughter of the first informant. The victim’s statement under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. indicated that she left the house of …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Munawwer, who was charged under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act for alleged sexual offences against a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, citing the victim's statement that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunny Kumar, who was charged under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(1) of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor. The applicant argued that the victim's statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNS Act were …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Kaushal, who is accused of raping a minor under Sections 65(1), 123(1), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the medico‑legal report did not support the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Rajjeet @ Ramji Rajbhar, who was charged with rape of a minor girl (aged 13 years 5 months) under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, there was no …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit Kumar, accused under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictory victim …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Junnur Khan, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)M of the BNS Act and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing to contradictory statements by the …
The applicant, a 17‑year‑old minor, was charged under Sections 64(1), 137(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly having a sexual relationship with a 16‑year‑old girl under the pretext of marriage. The FIR was lodged on 28‑06‑2026, two weeks after the alleged …
The High Court considered the bail application of Pramod Paswan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2) and 64(2)(m) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged belatedly, the victim's age was incorrectly recorded, and the …
Durgesh Paswan was arrested in connection with a case under the BNSS Act, 2023 (sections 87, 64(2)(m), 137(2)) and the POCSO Act (sections 5L/6) alleging that he enticed the daughter of the first informant. The victim, however, gave statements under sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS Act stating that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gautam Kumar, who was arrested in Crime No. 336 of 2026 under Sections 65(1), 137(2) of the BNS Act and Section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The FIR alleged that the sister of the first informant disappeared, but the victim’s statements under …
Kapil Kumar Prajapati applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 134 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNSS, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The FIR alleged that he had enticed the daughter of the first informant, but the victim’s statement under Sections 180 and 183 of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradyuman Dhanak, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 499 of 2025 alleging gang rape of a minor under Sections 332(b), 70(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
Uttam Basaur applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 499 of 2025) alleging gang rape of a 14‑year‑old girl under Sections 332(b), 70(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, a delayed FIR originally lodged in Madhya Pradesh, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilip, who was arrested in a case under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 4(2), 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing two minor girls away. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserted that one …
Salman was arrested in a case under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor. The victim’s statements indicated she left home voluntarily and lived with the accused, and there was no medical or radiological evidence to confirm her …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradumn @ Shamshir Khan @ Shamshir Alam in criminal case No. 0103 of 2026, which alleged offences under several sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act involving a minor girl aged 13 years. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Faizal @ Faizul, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted contradictions in the victim’s statements, and argued that medical …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chandu Mansoori, who was charged under Section 87 of the B.N.S. and Sections 5j(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged incident on 4 May 2026. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged on 14 May 2026, showing an inordinate delay, and that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dinesh Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging rape of a minor girl aged 12 years and 4 months. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Golu, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserted no criminal history, and highlighted a dispute …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Vishwkarma in a criminal case under Sections 64 and 137(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, asserted that the alleged victim, aged 17 years and six months, had left home …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rinku Gola, who was charged in Crime No. 554 of 2025 under sections of the CrPC, the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the S.C/S.T. Act for allegedly enticing a minor and creating obscene material. The applicant argued that an earlier FIR and a prior …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arvind Kumar Kashyap in Criminal Case No. 334 of 2026, which involved alleged sexual assault and outraging the modesty of a minor girl under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The …
Amardeep and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 25 July 2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act, and seeking a mandamus to prevent their arrest. The petitioners also made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the Supreme Court’s …
Vimal, the applicant, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 189 of 2026) under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The State argued that the investigation had been converted under Section 70(2) of the B.N.S., rendering the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sugreem, accused under Section 64(1) of the BNSS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged rape of a minor aged 16-17 years. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, there was no incriminating material, and he had no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shani Kumar in Criminal Case No. 156 of 2026, which involved charges under the B.N.S., the POCSO Act, and the SC/ST Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, citing the victim’s statement that she voluntarily left home and married …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek in a criminal case (Crime No. 476 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 87 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim, a minor aged 14 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Taufiq, who was arrested in Crime No. 180 of 2025 under Sections 87 and 64(1) of the BNS Act, Sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)5 of the SC/ST Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that the victim, now 19 years …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anurag, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 70(2) of the BNSS and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing out contradictions between the victim's …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Wasim Ali, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 216 of 2026 involving alleged sexual relations with a 17‑year‑10‑month‑old girl, false promise of marriage, and an alleged request to convert her religion. The applicant contended that he …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepchand, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crim No. 188 of 2026) alleging rape of a minor under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)m, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5j(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aditya Kumar Jha, who was arrested in a case alleging an attempt to commit rape under Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 62 and 64(1) of the B.N.S. Act. The applicant claimed false implication, asserted that the 17‑year‑old victim was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gulshan Nishad, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 64(2)(m), 87 of the BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl away and committing sexual offences. The victim, aged 15 years 11 months, gave a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas, accused in Crime No. 172 of 2025 for alleged rape of a girl aged 16 years 11 months under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the victim had …
The applicant, Amit @ Ravi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Upper Sessions Judge in a POCSO case. The applicant contended that he was already on bail when the NBW was issued and that the warrant was passed without first …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shah Alam, who was arrested in a case involving alleged rape of a minor under the POCSO Act and several sections of the BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the alleged incident occurred before his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Himanshu Kumar, who was arrested under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act for alleged inappropriate touching of a minor. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. were contradictory, and the medical …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shani, who is charged under Sections 64, 74, 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly outraging the modesty of a minor. The victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. indicated a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act in a case where the FIR alleged he had enticed the daughter of the first informant. The victim’s statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS …
Israr filed an application to cancel the bail granted to Suhail in a criminal case involving sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act. The applicant alleged that Suhail was threatening him to force a settlement and had complained to the Senior Superintendent of Police. The respondent argued that no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Kashyap, who was arrested in connection with a case under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act alleging sexual relations with a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal record, and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitesh Yadav, who was arrested in a rape case under Sections 64(2)(m) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil Rajbhar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS and Section 18 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, asserting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS indicated she left …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Gaurav, who was charged under sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S., sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act and section 3(2)V of the S.C.S.T. Act for an alleged offence involving the alleged enticement of a minor. The applicant argued …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Virendra, accused under Sections 64(2)m, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a 17‑year‑old girl under false promise of marriage, resulting in pregnancy and a child. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Upendra Paswan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 351(3) of the B.N.S., 67 of the Income Tax Act and Sections 13 and 14 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed that the alleged offence stemmed from a consensual …
The applicant, Upendra Paswan, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act, alleged to have sent photographs of a minor. He contended that the relationship was consensual, the victim had married him, and her age had been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aadil Faruqhi, who was arrested in connection with a case alleging sexual harassment of a minor girl under Sections 65(2) of the B.N.S., Sections 5(M)/6 of the POCSO Act and Sections 4/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Tipu Sultan, who is accused under Sections 62, 65(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(m), 6 and 18 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against two minor girls. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to …
Surjeet applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under the BNS Act, the POCSO Act and the D.P. Act, where the victim, a minor aged 17 years 11 months, alleged that the applicant had established a physical relationship on a false promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Avneesh, accused under sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to the victim’s statement that she left home voluntarily, conflicting age determinations …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sachin, who was charged under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictory statements by the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil alias Rocky, who was arrested in Crime No. 381 of 2026 for alleged rape of a 15‑year‑7‑month‑old girl under sections of the B.N.S., the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Momeen, accused in Crime No. 115 of 2026 under sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a minor by false promise of marriage, resulting in pregnancy. The applicant claimed the victim was a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nabi Husain, who was arrested in Crime No. 161 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)m of the BNS Act and Sections 51/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing and having sexual relations with a minor. The applicant claimed he was falsely …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Praduman Pandey, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual intercourse with a minor aged 15 years 9 months. The applicant claimed false implication, citing …
Mastram was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the alleged victim, though stated to be 16, appeared to be a major and that an ossification test placed …
Pawan Gupta filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act in Criminal Case No. 193 of 2026. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and instead move a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ritik, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2) and 64(2) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The alleged victim, aged 15‑16 years according to an ossification test, claimed to be a consenting party, had …
The applicant, Balram Pandey, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 335 of 2025) under Sections 65(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of an eight‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed false implication, citing the victim’s medical report as showing no injuries …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jaki, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, was a consenting party as per her …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankur Chauhan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim, who appeared to be a major, had …
Krishna Prasad, a 20‑year‑old with no prior record, was arrested on 06‑07‑2026 in connection with a case (Crime No. 200 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the …
The applicant, Tushar @ Nikki, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the alleged victim had voluntarily stayed with him, as reflected in her …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Yogesh, accused in Crime No. 55 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that the alleged victim, though 17 years old, appeared to …
The applicant, Taha Parvez, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 122 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS indicated that she had travelled …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rehan @ Azad Ansari, who was charged under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act, the Income‑Tax Act and the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act for alleged rape, video‑recording and forced conversion. The applicant …
Peer Mohammad applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under the BNS, POCSO Act and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserted the victim's consent, and pointed out the absence of any incriminating …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 07.05.2026 registered under Sections 75 and 115(2) of the BNS and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, and a writ of mandamus directing the arrest of a third respondent to ensure a fair …
The applicant, Mukesh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail in a rape case (Cr. No. 678 of 2024) alleging that the FIR was false, filed after a long‑term consensual relationship turned sour. He argued that the victim, a 21‑year‑old, had been in a relationship with him for seven years, that they were …
The applicant sought bail in a criminal case filed under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident, and a medical report dated 22 May 2026 established the victim as a 19‑year‑old …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas in Crime No. 313 of 2025, charged under Section 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5m/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged a year after the alleged incident, indicating a fatal delay, and that the victim, a minor, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Shivraj Singh Yadav, an 85‑year‑old accused in a case under Sections 74, 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 9m/10 of the POCSO Act for alleged molestation of a seven‑year‑old. The applicant argued that his advanced age and medical …
The applicant, Abrar, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 249 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 70(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 5g/6 of the POCSO Act. The first bail plea was rejected because of the victim's injury, but subsequently three key …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajad (N.K. Sharma) in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 70(2), 75, 79, 351(3), 308(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(g), 6, 7, 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a material …
Satish Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 335 of 2025) involving alleged rape and dowry‑related offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that there was no incriminating material or medical evidence …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chhatrapal, accused in Crime No. 68 of 2026 for offences under the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act, including alleged rape of a minor, administration of sedatives, and a resulting pregnancy that was later terminated. The victim, a girl of about 15‑17 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mukul, accused in Crime No. 28 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, had consented to live with him as a married couple and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramsewan, who was arrested in Crime No.118 of 2025 under sections 70(2), 303(3), 137(2), 317(2) of the B.N.S. and sections 5g/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, noting the victim’s testimony did not name him, the victim …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Afsar Ali, who was arrested in Crime No. 360 of 2026 under sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. and section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor girl aged about 12 years. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that …
Amit Gangwar applied for bail for the fourth time in a case registered as Crime No. 721 of 2024, involving charges under sections 64(2)(ड), 65(1), 69 of the BNS Act, sections 4(2), 5(L)/6 of the POCSO Act and section 66 of the I.T. Act. Earlier three bail applications had been rejected. The learned …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dheeraj Gaur in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident, that the victim voluntarily left home, married the …
Smt. Mausam filed an application to cancel the bail of the accused (opposite party no.2) in a criminal case alleging that the accused was pressurising her to compromise and thereby threatening the trial. The application relied on sections of the BNS Act, the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act, but no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramlakhan, who was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No.354 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The applicant Rajan sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.158 of 2026) alleging gang rape under Sections 70(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S., Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 67 of the IT Act. The prosecution alleged that the co‑accused Manish lured the victim to a field where Rajan and Vikas …
The applicant, Jitendra Patel, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.287 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS, which indicated …
The applicant, Ikhlak, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 246 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 64(2) and 137(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a consenting party, denied any sexual assault …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Kumar, who was charged under Sections 74, 78, 107, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing a medical report that the alleged victim survived the incident, …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under IPC sections 363, 372, 504, 506, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to file a regular bail …
Vishal applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 725 of 2025) involving charges under Sections 137(2) and 61(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, was a consenting party who voluntarily married …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sumit, who was arrested in a case involving alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old under Sections 70(1), 191(2), 115(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted a seven‑day delay in …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sajan @ Deepak Lodhi, who was arrested in a case involving alleged rape of a 16‑year‑old girl under the POCSO Act, as well as offences under the BNS Act, SC/ST Act and the IT Act. The applicant argued that the victim was a consenting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhure Urf Mohammad Hasan, accused under Sections 87, 70(2), 127(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(G) and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged gang rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged after a seven‑month delay, that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sagar, accused under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 13‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim's statements, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sachin @ Golu, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual intercourse with a minor girl aged about 15 years. The applicant claimed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmendra, accused in Crime No. 141 of 2026 for alleged gang rape of a 14‑year‑old girl under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant claimed false implication, lack of incriminating material, delay in filing the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajababu, who was arrested in a rape case (Criminal No. 225 of 2026) under sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing lack of incriminating material, an inconsistent victim statement, and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kanhaiya, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 138 of 2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing out the absence of a rape allegation in the FIR and the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramlakhan Nishad, who was charged under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act for alleged gang rape of a 14‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged five days after …
The applicant, Shahrukh Khan, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.135 of 2026) under Section 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(m)/6 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the material on record, noting that both the informant and the victim had turned hostile during the trial and …
Vikas Kumar applied for bail in a case registered under Section 65(1) of the BNSS and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication as his name does not appear in the FIR and the victim's statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS. The applicant argued that the victim, aged …
Manish Kumar was arrested in a case alleging rape of his 15‑year‑old daughter under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged six months after the alleged incident under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S., and the victim refused a medical examination. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kanhaiya Kumar under Section 5(J)(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication and noting that he had already been granted bail for other offences. The State opposed the bail, but the court examined the nature of the offence, the evidence, …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiva Sahariya, accused under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the medico‑legal report did not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raj, who was arrested in Crime No. 44 of 2026 under Sections 65(1), 87, 137(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the alleged victim, a 13‑year‑old girl, had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aman Kumar, who was arrested in a POCSO case alleging rape of a minor girl aged about 14 years. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dayashankar Rajbhar, who was arrested in connection with offences under sections 65(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual exploitation of a minor girl aged 15 years and 3 months. The applicant …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shubham Yadav, accused under sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and sections 5J(ii) and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a 17‑year‑old girl who was pregnant. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the entire proceeding of a complaint and a summoning order dated 30.04.2026. They contended that the complaint originated from an application under Section 173(4) B.N.S.S., which the magistrate incorrectly treated …
The applicant, Yusuf, sought bail in a case under Sections 64(2)(Ka) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 4, and 5J(ii) of the POCSO Act, alleging that a DNA report showed he was not the biological father of the victim's child. The State opposed bail, emphasizing that eight witnesses had already …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Kumar, who was arrested in a case involving alleged robbery and gang rape under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim's age was disputed (16 years 8 months …
The applicant, a shop‑keeper, was named in an FIR alleging assault, molestation, offences under the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, the cognizance order and to stay the trial, claiming he was falsely implicated, …
The petitioner, Kishan Baldevbhai Ravad, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested on 26‑Nov‑2025 in connection with an FIR (CR No. 11192006250255 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 64(2)(m), 87 and 137(2) of the BNSS and Sections 4, 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The alleged facts state that the accused had …
The applicant, Ajay Soni, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS (2023) seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 152 of 2026, which arose from Crime No. 463 of 2025 under Sections 74, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The application was intended to …
The applicant, Arvaj @ Hassan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the Special Case No. 1718 of 2025, which arose from Crime No. 136 of 2025 involving alleged offences under Sections 75(2) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The application …
The applicant, Sunmil Alias Sonu, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 3667 of 2025) arising from alleged offences under Sections 74, 333 of the BNSS and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act in Aligarh. The application was …
The applicant, Khadak Singh, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 140 of 2024) alleging offences under several IPC sections, the B.N.S Act and the POCSO Act. The Special Judge (POCSO) had already concluded the trial and delivered a conviction on 30 September 2025. The State's brief …
Rinku was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 172 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87 and 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming the alleged victim was a consenting party and that her age had been …
Anas applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 30 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 74, 64(1), 123(2) of the BNS and Sections 7, 8, 3, 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the three victims, aged between 16 and 18, were consenting parties who accompanied him on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 95 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3/4(ii) of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a minor aged 14-15, had …
Buddhvilas was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 94 of 2025) under Sections 137(2) and 64 of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the 19‑year‑old victim was a consenting party, and that her statement recorded …
The applicant, Nazir Ali @ Kuddus, sought bail in a criminal case under Section 65(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. He argued that the FIR was filed eight hours after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, and the victim’s age appeared to …
The applicant, Satendra, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 509 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS suggested consent, noting that she had accompanied …
Vishal Parihar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 25 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the BNS Act and Sections 5J(2) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court noted a 20‑day delay in lodging the FIR but observed that the victim’s statement indicated consent and that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suhail, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing and raping a 15‑year‑old girl. The prosecution relied on the victim’s statement and CCTV footage showing …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pawan Kumar, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 64 and 87 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence in Kushi Nagar. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS Act suggested consent, as she …
Munawwar Hasan Mansoori applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 154 of 2025) involving offences under Section 65(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(M) and 6 of the POCSO Act, with two child victims, one of whom sustained injuries. The applicant’s counsel failed to appear on multiple listed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sarik alias Shariq, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual activity with a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was delayed, …
The applicant, Jamunanand, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 175 of 2025) arising under Sections 74 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The application was filed in the High Court of Judicature …
Mukim alias Mokim applied for bail in a criminal case (No. 121 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 74 and 64(2)(m) of the BNS and Sections 5(m) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court noted an eight‑hour delay in lodging the FIR, suggesting false implication, and observed that the victim’s …
Vivek Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 248 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim was a consenting adult who had married him, and …
Rohit Kumar Savita applied for bail in a case under Sections 64(2)(M), 331(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging false accusations of rape by his niece. The applicant argued that the FIR was filed 21 days after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dayashankar, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNS) Act, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated that she had …
The applicant, Shubham Saini, filed a bail application in a gang‑rape case (Crime No. 30 of 2026) charged under Sections 70(2) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(G), 5(J)(ii) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS Act did not name the applicant as …
The applicant, Lavkush, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 525 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 64 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS was found by the court to be inherently …
Ram Pravesh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 517 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 65(1), 87, 137(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5L/6, 5N/6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS indicated that she had travelled with the applicant from …
The applicant, Satyabhan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 168 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS suggested consent, as she had accompanied the …
The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 215 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)m of the BNS and Sections 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The State Law Officer informed the court that the informant had been served notice but did …
The applicant, Ankit, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 38 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act. The court noted an inordinate delay of more than five months in lodging the FIR and observed that the alleged victim appeared to be a consenting …
Amit Gangwar was charged under sections of the BNS Act, the POCSO Act, and the IT Act for alleged sexual offences. After two earlier bail applications were denied, he filed a third bail petition claiming the parties had settled the matter and would marry. The State opposed, highlighting that the …
The applicant, Mohd Amir, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 23 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The court noted that the victim's statement under Section 183 BNSS suggested consent, as she had accompanied …
The applicant Jatin, owner of a hotel in Meerut, was implicated in Crime No. 119 of 2026 under sections 137(2), 61(2), 65(1) of the BNS and sections 16, 17, 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for allegedly failing to take the victim’s identification while taking that of a co‑accused. The prosecution …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 181 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 50 of 2025, which involved charges under various sections of the BNSS and the POCSO Act. The application was presented before the Hon'ble …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Satish Saini, accused under Sections 137(2) and 64 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl. The prosecution alleged the girl was a minor of about 16 years based on medical ossification reports, …
The applicants filed a Section 528 application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash a warrant, notice and order dated 02‑12‑2024 issued by the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Special Judge, POCSO Act) in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 376, 366, 363 IPC and Section …
The High Court entertained a habeas corpus petition filed by minor Smriti, aged about 16, seeking her release from police custody. The police produced Smriti before the Court and explained that she had been enticed to elope by a private respondent, Masoom, who is already in judicial custody for …
The applicant sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 90 of 2026) involving alleged gang-rape of a minor under Sections 70(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was delayed, there was no medical evidence, and the charges were politically …
Vishal was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 321 of 2025) under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 17‑year‑old, had allegedly traveled with Vishal, stayed with him, and married him, and her statement under Section 183 B.N.S.S. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Navi, who was charged under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged two months after the alleged incident, that the victim’s statement under …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arif in a criminal case (Crime No. 249 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4(1) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a …
Ajay was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual offences against a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that the FIR was lodged seven days after the alleged incident, that the victim …
Rizwan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.53 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 70(2), 115(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. He has been in custody since 6 March 2026. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Yameen, who faced identical charges, …
Ram Bahadur Yadav, accused under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The victim, a 19‑year‑old, had given a statement under Section 183 BNSS indicating consent and had married the accused. The court examined …
The applicant, Raj, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.83 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 61(2), 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(2) and 6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was delayed by a day, and the alleged victim was a …
The applicant, Sudarshan Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 183 of 2026, which stemmed from Crime No. 387 of 2025 involving offences under Sections 74 and 352 of the B.N.S. and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kunnu Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a case under several IPC sections, a provision of the B.N.S.S., and sections of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, an 18‑year‑old woman, had …
Lalit applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(L)/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, which was filed five days after the alleged incident, and that the victim, though recorded as a minor …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abrar, a 19‑year‑old accused in a criminal case (Crime No.212 of 2025) involving alleged sexual offences under the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the relationship with the 16‑year‑old victim was consensual and that the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiva Gautam, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the victim, a 19‑year‑old adult as confirmed by an ossification test, …
The petitioner, Pintu Bahardar, was arrested on 22 February 2026 in connection with a POCSO case alleging that he forcibly assaulted a minor girl in a field. The petitioner claimed the FIR was fabricated and sought bail. The State opposed bail, presenting the victim's statement recorded under …
The petitioners, Urmila Devi and her son Abhishek Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 96, 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. They claimed they were falsely implicated and argued that the alleged victim, the informant’s daughter, had voluntarily …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jai Kumar, who was charged with gang‑rape, video‑recording of the act, and offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused and a co‑accused raped the victim, recorded the act …
The revisionist, Indradev Vishwakarma, was charged with an attempt to commit rape under the POCSO Act, alleging the victim was about 14 years old. He contended that the victim was actually a major, that the FIR was lodged after a delay of one and a half months, and that the victim’s statements …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dataram @ Ravi, who was arrested on charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(j)(ii) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 16‑17‑year‑old girl, had given …
Anup Gupta was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 65(1), 87, 137(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act, alleged to involve a minor who was 18 years old. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S. indicated consent, and there was no medical evidence …
Amresh Jha was arrested on 26 November 2025 in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the BNS, following an FIR alleging the disappearance of a minor girl. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the FIR was fabricated, noting that the recovered victim …
The petitioner, Sikandra Kumar, was arrested on 10 October 2025 in connection with a case alleging kidnapping, rape, and the circulation of obscene photographs of a minor girl. The prosecution presented a victim statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS Act, confirming the allegations and …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar Singh, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the BNS and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the seriousness of the allegations, noting the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS and a supporting …
The petitioner, Ganesh Das, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in offences under several sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act, stemming from an alleged sexual assault by his son on a six‑year‑old girl and subsequent alleged assault on the informant and his wife leading to a miscarriage. …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Dubey, was accused in a Mohania police case of having a sexual relationship with the informant's minor daughter, alleged under sections of the B.N.S. and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The informant claimed the petitioner had been in a physical relationship with the girl …
The petitioners, Indra Kamal Yadav and Pradeep Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where co‑accused Deepak Kumar was alleged to have outraged the modesty of a minor and later threatened the informant’s son with a pistol. The FIR listed several serious offences under the …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS No 227 2025) alleged under sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and section 8 of the POCSO Act. He has been in custody since 7 December 2025 and claims a clean antecedent. The victim’s statement recorded …
The petitioner, Raja Mahto, was named in an FIR relating to alleged offences under several sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act, stemming from an incident where co‑accused Nitish Kumar and Kundan Kumar allegedly abducted two minor girls. The petitioner, who is the elder brother of Nitish Kumar, was …
Petitioner Kuldeep Kumar, arrested on 20 July 2025, sought bail in a case involving alleged rape of a 15-16 year old girl under Section 70(2) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution presented the victim's recorded statement under Section 183 of the BNSS, 2023 and a …
The petitioner, Pappu Bind, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Bhabhua P.S. Case No. 307 of 2025) under Section 96 of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act. The prosecution alleges that he kidnapped a girl, but the victim's statement under Section 183 of the same Act indicates that she …
The petitioner, Santosh Manjhi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 105, 74, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging that he had no mens rea for the death of an informant’s grandfather and that the FIR only shows a generic allegation of a push. The State opposed, …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with POCSO Case No. 62 of 2025, alleged to have assisted the main accused in kidnapping a child. He had been in custody since 12 January 2026. The petition sought bail, arguing that the main accused, Nardeo Kumar Sao, was the principal …
The petitioner, Sahul Bind, was arrested on 3 October 2025 in connection with a case registered on 26 September 2025 alleging that he raped a six‑year‑old girl. The FIR charges him under Sections 64/65(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the …
Rupchand Uraon, arrested on 16 January 2026, sought bail in connection with FIR No. 362 of 2025 alleging offences under Sections 64, 126(2), 115(2), 303(2) of the BNS and Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act, including rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The petitioner claimed the allegations were fabricated, …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was arrested in connection with a POCSO case alleging that he enticed a 14‑year‑old girl away for marriage and that his family aided the alleged abduction. He contended that the relationship was consensual, that the girl had expressed fear of her parents, and that she …
The petitioner, Mohammad Bittu Hasmi, was arrested following a police raid on an orchestra where several girls were rescued and alleged to be victims of trafficking. He is charged under multiple provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the POCSO Act, the Juvenile Justice Act, the Income Tax …
Vishnu Kushwaha was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 109 of the BNS, Section 27 of the Arms Act, Sections 8 and 10 of the POCSO Act and Section 64 of the BNS, alleging that he fired at the informant's house with the intent to kill the informant's daughter, with whom he had …
Mohan Ray petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after learning that he was named in an FIR alleging attempted sexual assault of an 11‑year‑old girl, the informant's minor granddaughter. The prosecution charged him under Sections 75, 76, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections …
The applicant, Deepak Shakyawar, was charged under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence involving a minor girl. The FIR was lodged 27 days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s statement indicated consent, noting that she had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Eklak, who is charged under sections 64(2)(m), 308(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences in Gorakhpur. The victim, born on 03‑07‑2007, was found pregnant and had undergone an abortion at the …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Dhanesh, who was charged in Crime No. 41 of 2025 under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under section 183 of the BNS indicated consent, but the victim’s age …
Shehzan Ui Haq applied for bail in a criminal case (No. 97 of 2025) involving offences under the BNS Act, POCSO Act and IT Act. The bail application was filed on 13 June 2025 but neither the applicant’s counsel nor the informant’s counsel appeared on the scheduled date of 15 April 2026. The Court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhola alias Vijay Kumar, who was arrested in a Special Session Case under the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued innocence, citing a four‑day delay in filing the FIR, absence of medical evidence, and that the FIR only …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atul Kumar, who was charged under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 352 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence that began as outraging modesty and was later escalated to rape. The victim’s statement recorded under …
Surendra Kumar alias Sachin applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 48 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, recorded as about 17 years old, allegedly gave consent and did not raise an alarm during the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Paramveer @ Lala, who was charged under Sections 70(2) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence at Khakhreru police station. The court noted an inordinate one‑day delay in lodging the FIR …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neeta Devi (alias Rita Devi) in a criminal case (Crime No. 149 of 2025) involving offences under the BNS Act, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant sought bail during the pendency of trial, citing that a co‑accused, Sandeep Tyagi, had …
Veeru Yadav (alias Atul Yadav) applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0109 of 2025) where he is charged under Sections 74, 351(3), 65(2) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 5m and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged outraging modesty and rape of a minor. The applicant contended that the rape allegation …
Satish Kumar Alias Golu applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.119 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 351(2), 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim, aged 16-18, had travelled with the applicant to Pune and did not raise any alarm, …
The applicant Ravi was charged under sections 137(2), 87 and 64 of the BNS and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence in Etawah. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, had accompanied the applicant to Rajasthan and did not raise any alarm, leading the trial court to record a statement …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neeraj in Criminal Case No. 109 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 65(1) and 351(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the victim turned hostile during …
