Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neetu @ Dudu, who had been in custody since 14 October 2025 in connection with a criminal case involving Sections 64, 351(3), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the POSCO Act. The court noted that a notice to the first informant had been …
Prem Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.106 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 5L/6 of the POSCO Act. The victim’s ossification test indicated an age of about 21 years, and the applicant’s counsel argued that the victim was a …
The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving a 16‑year‑old victim, as established by an ossification report. The applicant's counsel argued that the victim's statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S. showed no offence under Section 64, contending that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Sahu, who had been in custody since 30‑10‑2025 in connection with a case involving alleged offences under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S., and Sections 5L/6 of the POSCO Act. An ossification test revealed that the alleged victim was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raghuveer Nishad, who had been in custody since 18 September 2025 in connection with a case involving a 17‑year‑old victim. An ossification test confirmed the victim’s age as 17, but the applicant’s counsel argued that the victim was a major and …
