Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
10 judgments · newest first · showing 1–10
The applicant, Pravin Popatrao Deshmukh, a vendor of a sonography machine, faced allegations that the machine he sold to Bhaskar Ghadge was used for fetal sex determination, violating the PC‑PNDT Act. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar Singh, operating Manshi Ultrasound in Banka, challenged the sealing of his premises on 04‑03‑2025, alleging it was done without legal basis and in violation of the PC&PNDT Act. He sought a writ of mandamus to unseal the premises and to quash any prosecution under the Act. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a summoning order dated 08‑07‑2019 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal, in a case under Sections 4, 5, 6 and 23 of the PC‑PNDT Act, 1994. The applicant alleged that the complaint’s allegations were false, baseless and …
The appellant, a radiologist, was raided on 27 April 2017 after a decoy patient alleged that his clinic performed illegal sex‑determination ultrasounds. The raid was conducted by a team authorized only by the Civil Surgeon, who was the Chairman of the district Appropriate Authority, without the …
The Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India (FOGSI) challenged the constitutional validity of sections 23(1) and 23(2) of the Pre‑conception and Pre‑natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994, arguing that the provisions presumed guilt and violated …
The Union of India appealed against a Delhi High Court judgment that struck down Rule 3.3(1)(b) of the PCPNDT Rules, 1996 and Rule 6 of the Six‑Months Training Rules, 2014 on the ground that the Act did not empower the Central Government to prescribe qualifications or training for persons using …
Dr. Sabu Mathew George filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to block online advertisements and content facilitating sex selection, and to compel Google India, Yahoo! India and Microsoft Corporation to comply with the Pre‑conception and Pre‑natal Diagnostic Techniques …
The Supreme Court heard two writ petitions challenging the implementation of the Pre‑conception and Pre‑natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and its Rules. The petitioners sought directions for stricter enforcement, a centralised civil‑registration database, training …
The Voluntary Health Association of Punjab filed a writ petition seeking effective implementation of the Pre‑Conception and Pre‑Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex‑Selection) Act, 1994, alleging that many states had failed to enforce its provisions and that sex‑selective abortions …
The petitioners, including CEHAT, sought enforcement of the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, alleging that the Central and State governments had failed to implement its provisions to curb sex‑selection and female foeticide. The Supreme Court …
