BHAGWATI PRASAD DIXIT 'GHOREWALA'versusRAJEEV GANDHI
1986 INSC 9525 April 1986Dismissed
Bhagwati Prasad Dixit challenged the election of Rajiv Gandhi to the Lok Sabha on three grounds: alleged loss of Indian citizenship due to marriage and property in Italy, holding an office of profit by receiving a parliamentary salary, and the ineligibility of the Chief Election Commissioner. The High Court dismissed t…
SHRI CHARAN LAL SAHU AND ANR.versusSHRI K.R. NARAYANAN AND ANR.
1997 INSC 75124 November 1997Dismissed
Two petitioners, Charan Lal Sahu and Mithilesh Kumar, filed an election petition challenging the election of K.R. Narayanan as President of India. Their nomination papers were rejected because they did not satisfy the mandatory requirement of Section 5B(1)(a) of the Presidential and Vice‑Presidential Elections Act, 195…
DHARTI PAKAR MADAN LAL AGRAWALversusK.R. NARAYANAN AND ORS.
1997 INSC 75024 November 1997Dismissed
The petitioner, Dharti Pakar Madan Lal Agrawal, filed a composite election‑petition‑cum‑writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutionality of Sections 5‑B and 5‑C of the Presidential and Vice‑Presidential Elections Act, 1952 as amended by the 1997 Ordinance. The Supreme Court held that such a composite pe…
MITHILESH KUMAR SINHA ETC.versusRETURNING OFFICER FOR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND ORS. ETC.
1992 INSC 25317 September 1992Dismissed
Two election petitions were filed challenging the election of Dr. Shanker Dayal Sharma as President of India. Petition 1, filed by Mithilesh Kumar Sinha, claimed his nomination was wrongly rejected for not having the required ten proposers and ten seconders and argued that the signatures of common electors should remai…
MITHILESH KUMARversusSRI R. VENKATARAMAN & ORS.
1987 INSC 28616 October 1987Dismissed
In the 1987 Presidential election, R. Venkataraman was declared elected. Candidate Mithilesh Kumar filed an election petition under the Presidential and Vice‑Presidential Elections Act, 1952, alleging that a whip issued by the Congress (I) party amounted to undue influence and vitiated the election. The petition, howev…
KAKA JOGINDER SINGH ALIAS DHARTI PAKADversusK.R. NARAYANAN VICE PRESIDENT OF INDIA
1993 INSC 23816 July 1993Dismissed
Kaka Joginder Singh alias Dharti Pakad challenged the election of K.R. Narayanan as Vice‑President of India, alleging (i) that the Returning Officer wrongly accepted Narayanan's nomination despite substantial defects, and (ii) that a whip issued by the Congress party amounted to undue influence under the Presidential a…
CHARAN LAL SAHU & OTHERSversusGIANI ZAIL SINGH & ANOTHER
1983 INSC 19613 December 1983Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined three election petitions challenging the election of Giani Zail Singh as President of India. The petitioners, who had not been duly nominated as candidates under the Presidential and Vice‑Presidential Elections Act, 1952, claimed the returned candidate exercised undue influence and was unsuit…
PURNO AGITOK SANGMAversusPRANAB MUKHERJEE
2012 INSC 57311 December 2012Dismissed
In the 2012 presidential election, petitioner Purno Agitok Sangma challenged the election of Pranab Mukherjee on the ground that Mukherjee held two "offices of profit" – Chairman of the Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) and Leader of the House in the Lok Sabha – at the time of filing his nomination, which would disqua…
CHARAN LAL SAHUversusDR. APJ ABDUL KALAM AND ORS.
2002 INSC 52911 December 2002Dismissed
Charan Lal Sahu, an advocate, filed an election petition and a special leave petition challenging the election of Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam as President of India, alleging that his own nomination was wrongly rejected and that certain provisions of the Presidential and Vice‑Presidential Elections Act, 1952 were unconstitut…