Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988

12 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SUSHANTA KUMAR BANIKversusSTATE OF TRIPURA & ORS.

2022 INSC 105330 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sushanta Kumar Banik, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 on the basis of two FIRs for alleged drug trafficking. The State of Tripura sought preventive detention, arguing that he was a habitual offender, while the ap

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusSALEENA

2016 INSC 11129 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the detention of Abdu Rahiman under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA). The detenu filed a representation against his detention, which was rejected by the competent authority; the rejection was communicated to him by an under‑secretary rat

SAYED ABUL ALAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 98026 September 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sayed Abul Ala, was arrested for possession of large quantities of heroin and other narcotics and was remanded to judicial custody. While still in custody, he was detained under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 on the ground that he was likely to b

SMT. HEENA KAUSARversusCOMPETENT AUTHORITY

2008 INSC 52824 April 2008Dismissed

The wife of a man detained under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act was served a show‑cause notice under Chapter V‑A of the NDPS Act for alleged illegal acquisition of properties. The Appellate Tribunal ordered confiscation of the flats; the Bombay High Court dismissed t

THE STATE OF MANIPUR & ORSversusBUYAMAYUM ABDUL HANAN @ ANAND & ANR.

2022 INSC 111719 October 2022Dismissed

The State of Manipur detained Buyamayum Abdul Hanan under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. The detainee alleged that the detaining authority supplied only illegible or blurred copies of the documents on which the detention order was based, thereby denying him an

SMT. GRACYversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.

1991 INSC 4315 February 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The mother of Noor alias Babu filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking to quash his preventive detention order issued under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. The detenu had made a representation against his detention, but it was addressed only to the Centra

P. PAULSAMYversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

1999 INSC 26214 May 1999Case Allowed

P. Paulsamy was detained under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 to prevent alleged drug trafficking. He filed a representation against his detention on 26‑10‑1998, but the Government considered it only after a delay, finally rejecting it on 12‑11‑

SYED FAROOQ MOHAMMADversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1990 INSC 19414 May 1990Dismissed

Syed Farooq Mohammad was detained under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 after narcotics were seized from two cars on 19 July 1989. He challenged the detention on grounds of a five‑month delay in issuing the order, a further delay in arrest, non‑s

SMT. AZRA FATIMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 19812 July 1990Dismissed

The wife of Syed Ali Raza Shafiq Mohammed filed a writ petition challenging his preventive detention under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. The detenu was already in judicial custody with his bail application rejected, and the State sought to det

AMRITLAL AND ORS.versusUNION GOVERNMENT THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND ORS.

2000 INSC 5097 November 2000Disposed off

The appellants were arrested after a Central Bureau of Narcotics raid seized 132 kg of opium and they were charged under sections 8 and 18 of the NDPS Act, 1985. Their bail applications were rejected and they were subsequently detained under section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psycho

BIRENDRA KUMAR RAI ALIAS VIRENDRA KUMAR RAIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 2353 September 1992Dismissed

Birendra Kumar Rai was arrested under the Arms Act and Motor Vehicles Act and was in jail when a complaint under the NDPS Act was filed. While he remained in custody, a detention order under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (PITNDPS) was issued, c

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search