PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE AND INVESTMENT CO. LTD. AND ANRversusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA
1992 INSC 3230 January 1992Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Reserve Bank of India's 1987 directions regulating Residuary Non‑Banking Companies (RNBCs) under Sections 45J, 45K(3) and 45L of the RBI Act. The petitioners, a group of finance companies including Peerless, argued that the directions were ultra vires, unrea…
AMANDEEP SINGH SARANversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2023 INSC 102829 November 2023Disposed off
The appellant, Amandeep Singh Saran, was charged with offences including IPC Section 409, which carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment or up to ten years, and was being tried before the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Raipur, a court that can impose at most seven years imprisonment. Having already spent ove…
SRINIVASA ENTERPRISES & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA ETC.
1980 INSC 18924 September 1980Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, which imposes a total ban on prize chit schemes. Petitioners argued that the ban violated the fundamental right to trade under Art.19(1)(g), was discriminatory under Art.14, and exceeded Parliament's l…
RESERVE BANK OF INDIAversusPEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE & INVESTMENT CO. LTD. ORS. AND VICE VERSA
1987 INSC 2022 January 1987Dismissed
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) challenged the Peerless General Finance & Investment Co.'s Endowment Certificate Scheme, alleging it fell within the definition of a "prize chit" under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 and was therefore prohibited. The scheme involved long‑term subscripti…
RAVINDER SINGH SIDHUversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
2025 INSC 72719 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner, Ravinder Singh Sidhu, faced 64 FIRs across ten states arising from alleged financial fraud. He filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking the clubbing and transfer of all FIRs to a single jurisdiction, later modifying the prayer to consolidation within each state. The Supreme Court examined whether …
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.versusPEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 10119 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) could, under Section 45K(3) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, issue Paragraph 4A of the 1987 Directions prohibiting residuary non‑banking companies from levying processing or maintenance charges on depositors. Peerless General Finance & Investment Co. L…
MANICKLAL MUKHERJEE {KALI DURGA ESTATE), CALCUTIAversusCOMMISSIONER OF SANCHAITA INVESTMENTS CALCUTTA
1992 INSC 27714 October 1992Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Kali Durga Estate, entered into a registered agreement to sell its first‑floor premises to Sanchaita Investments for Rs.16 lakh, with an earnest payment of Rs.4 lakh and further installments. The contract stipulated that the buyer must pay the balance and take possession within 15 days of a notice from t…
M.A.A. ANNAMALAIversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANOTHER
2010 INSC 50712 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a former director of R.P.S. Benefit Fund Ltd., filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash criminal proceedings initiated under Section 420 IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Prize, Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. The FIR alleged cheating by the company for failing…
SUBRATA CHATTORAJversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2014 INSC 3929 May 2014Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined petitions seeking to shift investigation of the multi‑state chit‑fund (Ponzi) scam, which defrauded lakhs of depositors of roughly Rs 10,000 crore, from the State Police to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The scam involved companies operating across West Bengal, Tripura, Assam and …
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusSWAPAN KUMAR GUHA & ORS.
1982 INSC 132 February 1982Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether the FIR lodged against Sanchaita Investments and its partners disclosed a cognizable offence under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. The firm accepted public deposits at a nominal 12% interest but paid excess interest of up to 48% in cash, prompting th…