Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
The appeal was filed by two surviving appellants, Satya Dev and Rameshwar Dayal, against the conviction and sentencing order of a Special Judge in Mainpuri. Rameshwar Dayal had already been released on probation, while Satya Dev, a first‑time offender, was sentenced to two years and three months. …
The appellant Ugrasen was convicted under sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and sentenced to three months' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, not challenging the conviction, but contending that the trial court failed to consider the beneficial provisions of Section 360 of …
Girja Yadav was convicted under IPC sections 324 and 323 and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine, and six months' imprisonment respectively. He appealed only against the sentence, arguing that as a first‑time offender the trial court should have invoked Section 360 of the CrPC …
The appellants, Banarasi and Sadhu Yadav, were convicted by the Additional District Sessions Judge, Varanasi, for offences under sections 324, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment and fines. They appealed, not challenging the conviction itself, but contending that the …
The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 147, 323 and 149 and sentenced to six months rigorous imprisonment each, to run concurrently. They appealed solely on the sentence, arguing that as first‑time offenders the trial court should have considered the Probation Offenders Act, 1958 and …
