Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Anikesh, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighting …
The High Court of Gujarat entertained an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. The applicant, a 23‑year‑old, claimed innocence and argued …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chahat in a criminal case (Crime No. 280 of 2025) under Sections 137(2), 65(2) of the B.N.S.S and Sections 5(m) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, though a minor, gave consent as per her …
Balram Kumar Rajak was arrested for alleged kidnapping of a minor girl, an offence punishable under Section 87 of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged five days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. were contradictory, with the …
The petitioner, Himanshu Kumar, was named in an FIR relating to a sexual assault case involving a 14‑year‑old victim, where the FIR specifically alleges that Prince Kumar, son of Chandra Kishore Singh, committed penetrative rape. The petitioner contended that no allegation of penetrative assault was …
The petitioner, Neeraj Yadav, was arrested in connection with Mahila Police Station Case No. 74 of 2025, which alleged offences under the Bihar Nari Suraksha Act, POCSO Act, Juvenile Justice Act, Immoral Trafficking Act and the Bounded Labour System Act. The prosecution’s case is based on a raid at …
