Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920

18 judgments · newest first · showing 1–18

Indian BankversusShabbir Abbas Patel

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court examined whether the amendment inserting sub‑section (4) into Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – which bars the interim moratorium for applications against personal guarantors – operates retroactively on pending insolvency proceedings. After analysing …

SWARAJ INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.versusKOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.

2019 INSC 108Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered whether a secured creditor, Kotak Mahindra Bank, could file a winding‑up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 after obtaining a decree and recovery certificate from the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The petitioners argued that Sections 17, 18 and 34 of the Recovery of Debts …

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusV. RAMAKRISHNAN & ANR.

2018 INSC 711Appeal(s) allowed

State Bank of India (SBI) sought recovery of a loan from a corporate debtor whose managing director, V. Ramakrishnan, had also given a personal guarantee. After the corporate debtor defaulted, SBI invoked SARFAESI provisions and the debtor filed an insolvency petition under the Insolvency and …

M/S UMESH GOELversusHIMACHAL PRADESH COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.

2016 INSC 457Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an unregistered partnership firm, entered into a construction contract with the respondent and later contested the respondent's claim in arbitration. The respondent argued that Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act, 1932 barred the firm from participating in arbitral proceedings …

THE STOCK EXCHANGE, BOMBAYversusV. S. KANDALGAONKAR & ORS.

2014 INSC 678Appeal(s) allowed

The Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) declared member Suresh D. Shah a defaulter and the Income Tax Department sought to attach the proceeds of his membership card and securities under s.226(3) of the Income Tax Act. BSE argued that a membership card is a personal, non‑transferable privilege and that its …

JITENDRA NATH SINGHversusTHE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR & ORS.

2012 INSC 415Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant workmen sought priority over the sale proceeds of unsecured assets of UMI Special Steels Ltd., arguing that under Sections 529 and 529A of the Companies Act, 1956, workmen's dues should rank ahead of secured creditors on those assets. The respondents, representing the secured …

AL CHAMPDANY INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusTHE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR & ANR.

2009 INSC 220Appeal(s) allowed

Al Champdany Industries Limited purchased the assets of a company in liquidation. After the sale was confirmed, Bhatpara Municipality claimed arrears of property tax for periods before the sale and sought payment from the purchaser. The High Court held that the sale terms "as is where is" imposed a …

ICICI BANK LTD.versusSIDCO LEATHERS LTD. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 268Appeal(s) allowed

ICICI Bank and two other banks (first charge holders) and Punjab National Bank (second charge holder) had secured loans to Sidco Leathers Ltd., which was wound up and an Official Liquidator appointed. The first charge holders filed a suit in the Debt Recovery Tribunal and lodged a claim with the …

SANKAR RAM AND CO.versusKASI NAICKER AND ORS.

2003 INSC 346Appeal(s) allowed

Shankar Ram & Co. purchased 249 shares of Rajapalayam Mills from the bank on 24‑08‑1978, paying Rs.25,155.40, without knowledge that the shareholder, Kasi Naicker, had filed an insolvency petition in 1976. The petition was dismissed in 1977, but an order of adjudication was finally passed on …

THAMPANOOR RAVIversusCHARUPARA RAVI AND ORS.

1999 INSC 402Appeal(s) allowed

Thampanoor Ravi was elected to the Kerala Legislative Assembly and his election was challenged on two grounds: (i) that he was an "undischarged insolvent" within the meaning of Article 191(1)(c) of the Constitution, and (ii) that he had indulged in corrupt practices under Section 123 of the …

SRI BABU RAM @ DURGA PRASADversusSRI INDRA PAL SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS.

1998 INSC 306Dismissed

The plaintiff, an undischarged insolvent, entered into a joint application with the creditor to sell his land for the debt amount, with a clause allowing repurchase within five years. After the sale deed was executed by the Official Receiver, the plaintiff was adjudicated insolvent, but later …

HARSHAD SHANTILAL MEHTAversusCUSTODIAN AND OTHERS

1998 INSC 233Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of Section 11 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, which governs the discharge of liabilities and distribution of attached property of notified persons such as Harshad Mehta. It held that only taxes …

TUKARAM RAMCHANDRA MANE (DEAD) BY LRS.versusRAJARAM BAPU LAKULE (DEAD) BY LRS.

1998 INSC 182Dismissed

The appellant, the creditor, claimed that a regular sale deed executed by the debtor was revived after the Insolvency Court annulled its earlier adjudication, thereby extinguishing the debtor‑creditor relationship under the Maharashtra Debt Relief Act, 1975. The debtor‑creditor relationship …

JAGANNATHversusSHRI YUGAL NARAIN PUROHIT, ADV. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1524Dismissed

The appellant Jagannath challenged a sale of property made by the insolvent Bhadarmal to the respondent Yugal Narain Purohit on May 17, 1958, seeking a declaration under Section 53 of the Provincial Insolvency Act that the transfer was fraudulent. The trial court, a single judge and a division bench …

THE RECOVERY OFFICER, LAKHIMPUR AND ORS.versusSMT. RAVINDRA KAUR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1435Dismissed

The Recovery Officer, under the Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965, initiated recovery proceedings under Section 91 to attach and sell the lands of members who had defaulted on loans taken for seeds and manure. The members contended that the statutory charge created by Section 39(a) …

PRABHU SHANKAR JAISWALversusSRI SHEO NARAIN JAISWAL

1996 INSC 1250Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant and several respondents were partners in an unregistered partnership firm and a suit for dissolution and accounts was filed by one partner. The partnership deed contained an arbitration clause, leading the appellant to obtain a stay of the suit under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act …

BALKRISHAN GUPTA AND ORS.versusSWADESHI POLYTEX LTD. AND ANR

1985 INSC 24Dismissed

The Collector of Kanpur appointed a receiver over Swadeshi Cotton Mills Ltd. and ordered the seizure, attachment and pledge of its 10 lakh shares in Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. The Cotton Mills Company, together with four other shareholders, requisitioned an extraordinary general meeting of Polytex under …