Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Public Demand Recovery Act

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M.N. OJHA & ORS.versusALOK KUMAR SRIVASTAV & ANR.

2009 INSC 106321 August 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, bank officials, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a criminal complaint filed by a guarantor alleging offences under the IPC. The Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance of the complaint and issued non‑bailable warrants without examining

MAHARAJA CHINTAMANI SARAN NATH SAHDEOversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1999 INSC 4647 October 1999Dismissed

Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Sahdeo, a proprietor of mines and minerals, received compensation under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 calculated at three times his net annual income and later accepted an additional payment calculated at ten times the income. The Member, Board of Revenue later reopened the case and or

S.D. BANDIversusDIVISIONAL TRAFFIC OFFICER, KSRTC & ORS.

2013 INSC 4405 July 2013Disposed off

The appeal arose from the appellant, a driver of KSRTC, who failed to vacate a government quarter after being transferred and whose eviction order was upheld by the High Court but later set aside by the Supreme Court. The Court examined the effectiveness of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act,

M. NAGABHUSHANAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & OTHERS

2011 INSC 922 February 2011Dismissed

The appellant, owner of two plots of land, challenged the acquisition of his land under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, alleging that the land lay outside the Framework Agreement and that the acquisition was invalid because no award was made within two years as required by Section 11A of the Land

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search