Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Public Gambling Act

7 judgments · newest first · showing 1–7

RAVI JAAT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS and Sections 3 and 4 of the Public Gambling Act, fearing arrest in a criminal case. The State opposed, arguing that the alleged offences do not carry a punishment exceeding seven years and that Section 35(3) of the …

KRISHNA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Krishna Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case involving alleged violations of the IPC, Income‑Tax Act and Public Gambling Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, that the mobile number and transaction attributed to him were false, and that there was no independent or …

MOHD RAFEEQversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mohd Rafeeq applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 11 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, Income Tax Act and Public Gambling Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, that the mobile number and transaction attributed to him were false, and that there …

RANVEER KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ranveer Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 11 of 2025) based solely on information from an informer, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The applicant contended that the mobile number and alleged transaction attributed to him were false, and that there was …

ALOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Alok Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 11 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the B.N.S., Income Tax Act and Public Gambling Act, but he was not named in the FIR. The applicant contended that the mobile number and transaction attributed to him were false, and that the …

NITIN BABUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nitin Babu, who was arrested in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5) of the same Act and Section 13 of the Public Gambling …

HIMANSHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Himanshu, who was arrested in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5) of the same Act and Section 13 of the Public Gambling …