Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
Lalsa Ram, a direct‑recruit Naib Tehsildar, was promoted to Deputy Collector solely on seniority. The Uttar Pradesh government later ordered his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(c) of the U.P. Fundamental Rules, relying on several adverse entries in his service record that pre‑dated his …
Shri Chamba Singh, a police officer who had served since 1961, was ordered to retire prematurely on public interest grounds under Rule 3(i)(a) of the Punjab Civil Services (Premature Retirement) Rules, 1975. He had earlier been punished under the Punjab Police Rules, 1934, with forfeiture of three …
R.L. Khurana, originally a clerk in the Punjab Police, was appointed as an Excise Sub‑Inspector and later reverted to his parent department. He obtained a decree from a civil court confirming his right to continue in the substantive Excise post, overturning the reversion. Subsequently, the Excise …
The appellant, a senior government officer, was prematurely retired under Rule 3 of the Punjab Civil Services (Premature Retirement) Rules, 1975. He challenged the order, arguing that the State had relied on remote adverse entries in his confidential reports and had ignored his representations …
The respondent, Manohar Lal, a Sub‑Inspector of Police, was compulsorily retired by an order dated 24 September 1975 issued by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur, under the Punjab Civil Services (Premature Retirement) Rules, 1975. He filed a suit seeking a declaration that the order was …
Hans Raj, a clerk who began service in 1949, was prematurely retired by the Deputy Commissioner of Bhatinda on 20 August 1975 under Rule 3(1)(a) of the Punjab Civil Services (Premature Retirement) Rules, 1975, on the ground that he had completed more than 25 years of service. He challenged the …
