Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965

7 judgments · newest first · showing 1–7

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusHARBHAJAN SINGH AND ANR.

2007 INSC 1113Appeal(s) allowed

Harbhajan Singh, a former Indian Army soldier who retired in 1987 and was drawing a defence pension, was re‑employed as a JBT teacher in the Punjab Education Department from 1994 to 2002. He applied for a civil‑service pension, arguing that his army service should be counted towards the ten‑year …

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.versusSHRI OM PRAKASH

2006 INSC 410Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a former member of the Armed Forces discharged on 13 June 1967, was appointed to a civil post in 1972 and claimed a pension under Rule 4(iii) of the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965. The State argued that the gap of more than three years between discharge …

SUKHDEV SINGH GILLversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

2000 INSC 495Dismissed

Sukhdev Singh Gill, a former Superintendent in the General Reserve Engineer Force (GREF), sought to have his service counted as "military service" for seniority purposes under the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965. The High Court rejected his claim and dismissed his writ …

CHITTARANJAN SINGH CHIMA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1997 INSC 112Dismissed

The appellants, former Indian Air Force sergeants, were appointed as junior Sports Officers by the Punjab Government under the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965, and claimed that their 15 years of military service should be counted for seniority and consequential benefits …

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATIALA AND ANR.versusSURJIT SINGH BRAR

1996 INSC 1325Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, an ex‑army officer who served from 1963 to 1973, was appointed to a civil post in 1979 under the ex‑servicemen quota and was granted pay increments and seniority under the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965 (Rules 2 and 4). The State later realised that he …

DHAYANAND ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

[1995] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 533Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, former servicemen re‑employed in the Union Territory of Chandigarh after 1 Nov 1966, claimed that the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965 should apply to them for increments, seniority, promotion and pension. The Union Territory argued that the 1965 Rules …

D. K. JAIN AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 555Dismissed

The State of Haryana relaxed the minimum qualification for ex‑military personnel, appointing diploma‑holding engineers as Assistant Engineers under Rule 3(iii) of the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965, and counted their military service for seniority. The respondents, …