Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

MOHINDER SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusPARAMJIT SINGH & ORS.

2018 INSC 28328 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a suit for possession of ancestral land that had been alienated by a gift deed. The original plaintiff, Mohinder Singh, obtained a declaratory decree in 1963 based on a compromise, but the decree was conditional on the death of the donor, Ujjagar Singh, which occurred in 1971. The decree sheet was fi

RANBIR SINGH AND ORS.versusKARTAR SINGH AND ORS.

2003 INSC 11525 February 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Surtu, daughter of Basanti, sued the defendants for possession of land after Basanti, a widow who held only a life estate in her husband's ancestral property, allegedly made an oral gift of portions of that land to collaterals in 1936. The trial court held that the widow had no right to alienate the prop

DARSHAN SINGH AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusRAM PAL SINGH AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1990 INSC 36120 November 1990Dismissed

The appellants were contesting alienations of immovable property under the Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Act, 1920, and their suits were at the appellate stage when the Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Amendment Act, 1973 came into force on 23 January 1973. The High Court dismissed the appeals, holding that after th

BHAG MAL (ALIAS) RAM BUX AND ORS.versusMUNSHI (D) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2007 INSC 6017 January 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, sons of Sher Singh, inherited land sold by their father to Bansi. They challenged the sale in a suit that was dismissed, but on appeal a declaratory decree was obtained in their favour. While the decree was pending, both Sher Singh and Bansi died, and the appeal was abated on 14‑Oct‑1977 because Bansi's

SAROOP SINGHversusBANTO AND ORS.

2005 INSC 5007 October 2005Dismissed

The appellant, Saroop Singh, claimed ownership of suit properties that had been gifted to him by the widow, Indira Devi, who possessed only a life interest under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The respondents, Banto and others, were reversioners who sued for possession, asserting that the widow's gift did not affect t

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search