Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
9 judgments · newest first · showing 1–9
Harjit Singh and another, constables in the Punjab Police, were dismissed for being absent from guard duty at a hospital where an elderly convict was shackled. They challenged the dismissal, arguing that the disciplinary authority had not complied with Rule 16.2 of the Punjab Police Rules and the …
The respondent, Rajesh Kumar, a constable appointed on 2 December 1989, was discharged on 18 October 1992 under Rule 12.21 of the Punjab Police Rules on the ground of unauthorized absenteeism and unsuitability. Lower courts, including the High Court, held that the discharge was punitive, based on …
The State of Punjab initiated disciplinary action against Dharm Singh for failing to report for duty during his suspension from 21 November 1991 to 31 October 1992. An inquiry concluded that his absence was wilful, leading to his removal from service. The Punjab & Haryana High Court set aside the …
Three police officers, including the petitioners, led a peaceful procession after duty hours to present a grievance about inadequate accommodation to the Superintendent of Police, in violation of a prohibitory order. They were dismissed from service under Rule 16(2) of the Punjab Police Rules for …
Karam Singh, a Punjab police constable, was convicted under IPC Section 323 and released on probation, while being acquitted of murder (Sec. 302) and grievous hurt (Sec. 324). He applied for reinstatement, but the police authorities rejected his request under Rule 16.2(2) of the Punjab Police Rules. …
Jagdish Chander, appointed as a constable on 30 October 1985, was discharged on 1 June 1992 under Rule 12.21 of the Punjab Police Rules for alleged habitual absenteeism, negligence and indiscipline. He challenged the discharge before the High Court, which set aside the order and directed his …
Jaswant Singh, a police constable, was dismissed by the Assistant Inspector‑General of Police under Punjab Police Rules on the ground that he threatened to obstruct any departmental enquiry and to harm witnesses. The authority invoked clause (b) of the second proviso to Article 311(2) of the …
The appellants, Malak Singh and Jaswant Singh, challenged the inclusion of their names in a police surveillance register maintained under the Punjab Police Rules, alleging that the entry was made without any material basis and violated their fundamental right to privacy under Articles 21 and …
Pratap Singh was appointed as a temporary Assistant Sub‑Inspector of Police on 2 July 1973. His services were terminated on 26 September 1977 by the Senior Superintendent of Police. He challenged the termination, arguing that Rule 12.8(1) of the Punjab Police Rules placed him on a three‑year …
