Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.versusM/S. SHIKHA TRADING CO.

2023 INSC 77325 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed

Shikha Trading Co. filed a writ petition challenging the illegal sealing of its shop by Excise and Taxation officers. The Punjab High Court, besides ordering the de‑sealing, directed that a criminal case be registered against Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner Rishi Pal Singh, alleging that he filed a false aff

M/S TECNIMONT PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS

2019 INSC 105418 September 2019Disposed off

The Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 requires a 25% pre‑deposit of the additional demand before a first appeal can be entertained under Section 62(5). Assessors, including Punjab State Power Corporation, filed appeals and sought waiver of this requirement on grounds of financial hardship, challenging the provision as o

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.versusNOKIA INDIA PVT. LTD.

2014 INSC 88217 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Punjab challenged the tax treatment of battery chargers sold by Nokia India with cell phones, arguing that they should attract the concessional VAT rate of 4% under entry 60(6)(g) of Schedule B of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The Assessing Authority, Appellate Authority and the VAT Tribunal held t

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.versusTRISHALA ALLOYS PVT. LTD.

2025 INSC 23117 February 2025Dismissed

The State of Punjab amended the Punjab Value Added Tax Rules on 25 January 2014 by inserting sub‑rule (8) in Rule 21, which allowed input tax credit (ITC) on stock of goods to be claimed at the reduced tax rate that became applicable on 1 February 2014. The amendment was made before the parent statute, the Punjab VAT A

PUNJAB & SIND BANKversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2023 INSC 10797 December 2023Dismissed

Punjab & Sind Bank appealed against a High Court order that upheld the State of Punjab's claim of priority over tax dues under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005, which it alleged superseded the bank's charge on the borrower’s immovable property. The State asserted a first charge under Section 35 of the 2005 Act for

M/S NARESH KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER

2025 INSC 7191 May 2025Disposed off

The Punjab government amended section 29 of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 in 2013, extending the time limit for tax assessment from three to six years and inserting a new sub‑section (10A). Several assessees challenged the amendment, arguing that it was prospective, violated Articles 14 and 19, contravened natur

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search