Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

ARJUN CHAUBEYversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1984 INSC 6623 March 1984Appeal(s) allowed

Arjun Chaubey, a senior clerk in the Northern Railway, was served with twelve charges of gross indiscipline, many of which related to the Deputy Chief Commercial Superintendent (Respondent 3). After submitting explanations, Respondent 3 himself evaluated the explanations and dismissed Chaubey under Rule 14(ii) of the R

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusP.C. RAMAKRISHNAYYA

2010 INSC 52718 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Group B officer of the Geological Survey of India, was subjected to a departmental inquiry under Rule 14(2) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, where the Inquiry Officer was a retired chief general manager taken from a panel approved by the Central Vigilance

MONI SHANKARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2008 INSC 2974 March 2008Case Allowed

Moni Shankar, a booking supervisor with Central Railways, was caught in a decoy check and was found to have overcharged a passenger by Rs.5. A departmental proceeding found him guilty and imposed a penalty of reduction to the lowest pay scale; his appeal and revision were dismissed. He filed an application before the C

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search