Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The case concerned departmental trap investigations conducted by Railway Vigilance officers against three railway ticket examiners who were alleged to have demanded excess money from decoy passengers. The respondents were charged under Rule 3 of the Railway Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and, after …
The appellant, a Head Clerk with 31 years of commendable service in the Northern Railways, supplied an "absentee" statement to a co‑worker who was litigating against the Railways. The Railway disciplinary authority treated this act as a serious misconduct, held the appellant guilty of leaking …
The appellant, a former casual labourer who was later given temporary status as a khalasi in the Indian Railways, was charged with fraudulently obtaining his appointment letter and was dismissed after a disciplinary enquiry. The enquiry report relied on the order of his appointment as documentary …
The respondents obtained appointments in the Railway Service by presenting forged casual labourer service cards. When the fraud was discovered, the Railway authorities removed them and the respondents sought reinstatement before the Central Administrative Tribunal, which ordered their reinstatement …
