Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioner, Ashok Totaram Marsale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of orders that denied him family pension and directing the respondents to pay pension per the Railway Pension Manual, 1993. The respondents contended that the petition was not maintainable and that the …
The respondent, a senior railway officer, alleged that his basic pay was reduced in October 2020 from Rs 99,800 to Rs 86,100 without any order, and that the Railways had been recovering Rs 17,65,430 as excess payment for a period dating back to 2004. The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) had …
The case concerned commission vendors of the Northern Railway who, after being absorbed into regular railway service, sought to have 50% of their pre‑absorption service counted as qualifying service for pension benefits, as had been granted to similarly situated vendors in other railway zones. The …
The widow of Ram Niwas, a project casual labourer who was later treated as a temporary employee under a scheme approved by the Supreme Court, applied for family pension after his death in 1988. The Railway Administration rejected the claim, citing the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993, which …
The case concerned whether a railway employee who retired on 31 January 1995 was entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 or whether the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 governed his benefit. The Union of India argued that Section 2(e) of the 1972 Act expressly excludes …
The appellant, a railway signal engineer, was suspended on 21‑January‑1982 and later compulsorily retired on 25‑November‑1992. During the suspension he received only a subsistence allowance equal to 75 % of his revised basic pay, which the President ordered to count as qualifying service for pension …
