Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 1954

The State of Rajasthan promoted thirteen officers under Rule 28‑B of the Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 1954, nine on seniority‑cum‑merit and four on merit. Sriram Verma, a senior officer, claimed his junior Ashok Kumar Sanvaria was promoted over him and appealed to the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribu…

The petitioners, senior Rajasthan Administrative Service officers, challenged the validity of a 2011 notification granting consequential seniority to SC/ST employees, alleging it violated Supreme Court directions in M. Nagaraj and Suraj Bhan Meena. The High Court had held the notification void and in contempt, but the …

The appellants, senior officers of the Rajasthan Administrative Service, challenged the 1987 amendment to the Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules that created a Super Time Scale, contending that these posts were merely “higher posts” and should be filled on a 50:50 merit‑seniority basis. The High Court held that the…

The petitioners challenged their promotions on the ground that their service records were not "outstanding" throughout the period considered, invoking Rule 28‑B of the Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 1954. The State argued that an amendment to Rule 28‑B made on 30‑Nov‑1991, which clarified the requirement, shou…

The Rajasthan High Court quashed two state notifications that granted consequential seniority to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe officers promoted under reservation, on the ground that the state had not complied with the requirements laid down in M. Nagaraj's case. The petitioners, members of the Rajasthan Administ…