Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954

21 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M/S. INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2017 INSC 81728 August 2017Dismissed

Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd entered into a works contract with the Rajasthan Public Health and Engineering Department to supply and lay pre‑stressed cement concrete (PSC) pipes, valves and related materials, together with civil works. The company claimed exemption from sales tax under Section 7AA of the Rajasthan Sales Ta

M/S JK SYNTHETICS AND ANR. ETC.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ANR

1997 INSC 6928 January 1997Disposed off

J.K. Synthtics Ltd., a manufacturer of tyre‑cord fabric, claimed exemption from sales tax under a 1957 notification issued under Section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The State of Rajasthan later issued notifications in 1980 and 1981, the latter stating that "all the notifications" issued under Section 8(5)

COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICERversusM/S. BOMBAY MACHINERY STORE

2020 INSC 36827 April 2020Dismissed

The Commercial Taxes Officer challenged the exemption claimed by M/s Bombay Machinery Store under Section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, arguing that the State’s circulars imposed a 30‑day time‑limit after which goods retained by a carrier were deemed to be constructively delivered, converting the inter‑state

ONKARLAL NANDLALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

1985 INSC 20123 September 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a registered dealer, purchased poppy seeds on a Form ST‑17 declaration stating they were for "resale within the State" and subsequently resold them in Bhawani Mandi. The Commercial Tax Officer held that because the resales were sales in the course of inter‑State trade, they could not be treated as "resal

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.versusM/S. MAHAVEER OIL INDUSTRIES AND ORS.

1999 INSC 19622 April 1999Disposed off

The State of Rajasthan, under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, issued an incentive scheme in 1987 exempting new industrial units, including oil extraction and manufacturing, from sales tax. In 1990 the State withdrew this exemption for oil industries by a notification issued under both the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act and

TAXES OFFICER, CIRCLE-B, BHARATPURversusM/S BHAGAT SINGH

2021 INSC 3621 January 2021

M/s Bhag​at Singh purchased a truck on 26‑12‑2009 and was served a summons under the Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicle into Local Areas Act, 1988 in July 2012. An assessment order was issued on 9‑Oct‑2012 levying entry tax, penalty and interest. The assessee appealed, arguing that the assessment was barred by the

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, RAJASTHANversusM/S BINANI CEMENT LTD. & ANR.

2014 INSC 11219 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Binani Cement Ltd., set up a new cement plant in Rajasthan and claimed a Fixed Capital Investment (FCI) of Rs.532.52 crores, seeking exemption from sales tax under the "Sales Tax New Incentive Scheme for Industries, 1989". The State Level Screening Committee granted only a 25% exemption, treating the un

GANNON DUNKERLEY AND CO. A.ND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1992 INSC 31217 November 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined appeals by Gannon Dunkerley Co. and other contractors challenging the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 and its rules which imposed tax on the transfer of property in goods used in works contracts. The Court held that Section 5(3) of the Act and sub‑rule (i) of Rule 29 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax

COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICERversusM/S. JALANI ENTERPRISES

2011 INSC 21817 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether Jaljira and similar spice mixtures manufactured by M/s Jalani Enterprises constitute "packed masala" under Entry No. 184 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax notification dated 29.03.2001. The High Court had held that Jaljira was a drink falling under the residuary entry and liable to tax at 10

STATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPURversusNATIONAL IRON AND STEEL ROLLING CORPORATION AND ORS.

1994 INSC 60514 December 1994Dismissed

The State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur had advanced cash credit to National Iron and Steel Rolling Corporation, which secured the loan by mortgaging its factory and pledging plant and machinery. When the bank sued for repayment, the mortgaged property was auctioned and the Commercial Tax Officer claimed a prior right to

M/S. BIRLA CORPORATION LTD.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

1999 INSC 9911 March 1999Dismissed

Birla Corporation Ltd., a cement manufacturer, bought dumpers in Tamil Nadu and paid tax under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. When the dumpers entered Rajasthan, the state demanded entry tax under the Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles Into Local Areas Act, 1988. The assessee sought a rebate under Section 4(2)

M/S. SHIV SHAKTI GOLD FINGERversusASSTI. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, JAIPUR

1996 INSC 68310 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Shiv Shakti Gold Finger applied for exemption from Rajasthan sales tax on its Gole Papad, a circular snack made of maida, salt, starch, papad soda, alum and food colour, invoking a 1970 notification that exempted "Papad and Badi (Mangori)". The Assistant Commissioner rejected the claim, holding that the exemption did n

20TH CENTURY FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2000 INSC 3049 May 2000

The appellants, leasing companies, entered into master lease agreements for equipment and were taxed by several states on the transfer of the right to use the goods. The states relied on explanations in their sales tax statutes that deemed the taxable event to occur where the goods were used, irrespective of where the

J.K. SYNTHETICS LTD.versusTHE COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER

1994 INSC 1979 May 1994

J.K. Synthetics Ltd. filed sales‑tax returns on the basis that freight charges on cement sales were not part of the taxable price and paid the tax shown in those returns. The Commercial Taxes Officer later added the freight amount to the sale price, assessed additional tax and levied interest under Section 11‑B of the

DELHI CLOTH AND GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

1980 INSC 1158 May 1980Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co., manufactured "rayon tyre cord fabric" and claimed exemption from sales tax under Item 18 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, which referenced "rayon fabrics" as defined in the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 and Item 22 of the Central Exc

COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER, JODHPURversusM/S. VISHNU METALS

2006 INSC 7907 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Vishnu Metals, a manufacturer of stainless steel sheets, expanded its installed capacity and claimed a sales‑tax exemption under the Rajasthan Sales Tax New Incentive Scheme, 1989, on the ground that its total production—including job‑work performed for others—had increased by more than 25% of the original capacity. Th

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.versusM/S. D.P. METALS

2001 INSC 4814 October 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 requires transporters to carry declaration Form ST‑18A and other documents under Section 78(2). A truck of Mis D.P. Metals was stopped at a check‑post without the form, seized and a penalty of 30% of the goods' value was imposed under Section 78(5). The respondents challenged the const

M/.S. GULJAG INDUSTRIESversusCOMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER

2007 INSC 8103 August 2007Disposed off

The case concerned several civil appeals arising from the imposition of penalty under Section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 (in pari materia with Section 22A(7) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954) for carrying goods in movement with blank Form ST‑18A/18C that had been signed but left incomplete. The Supr

D. PARRY (INDIA) LTD.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, CHENNAI

2005 INSC 2473 May 2005Appeal(s) allowed

E.I.D. Parry (India) Ltd., a sugar manufacturer, purchased sugarcane at a statutory minimum price and an additional price under Clause 5‑A of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966. The additional price could be determined only after the sugar year ended, so the company paid an advance on that price, recorded only the min

ASSOCIATED CEMENT CO. LTD.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, KOTA & ORS.

1981 INSC 1572 September 1981Case Partly allowed

Associated Cement Co. Ltd., a cement manufacturer, filed its sales‑tax returns for 1973‑74 under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act without including freight charges, believing they were not taxable. After the Supreme Court in Hindustan Sugar Mills Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan held that freight for

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search